Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020483
Title: Influence of urbanization on demography of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the prairies of North America
Authors: Coleman J.L. 
Barclay R.M.R.
Keywords: article
basic reproduction number
bat
body constitution
Canada
city
controlled study
demography
disease transmission
female
insect
intraspecific competition
male
noise
nonhuman
North America
population density
postnatal growth
prairie
prey
reproductive success
riparian ecosystem
rural area
spermatogenesis
stress
urban area
urbanization
animal
bat
body weight
bone
ecosystem
growth, development and aging
histology
newborn
organ size
physiology
reproduction
Aves
Hexapoda
Myotis lucifugus
Vertebrata
Alberta
Animals
Animals, Newborn
Body Weight
Bone and Bones
Chiroptera
Demography
Ecosystem
Female
Male
Organ Size
Reproduction
Spermatogenesis
Urbanization
Issue Date: 2011
Citation: Coleman J.L., Barclay R.M.R. (2011). Influence of urbanization on demography of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the prairies of North America. PLoS ONE 6 (5) : e20483. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020483
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: We address three key gaps in research on urban wildlife ecology: insufficient attention to (1) grassland biomes, (2) individual- and population-level effects, and (3) vertebrates other than birds. We hypothesized that urbanization in the North American Prairies, by increasing habitat complexity (via the proliferation of vertical structures such as trees and buildings), thereby enhancing the availability of day-roosts, tree cover, and insects, would benefit synanthropic bats, resulting in increased fitness among urban individuals. Methodology/Principal Findings: Over three years, we captured more than 1,600 little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in urban and non-urban riparian sites in and around Calgary, Alberta, Canada. This species dominated bat assemblages throughout our study area, but nowhere more so than in the city. Our data did not support most of our specific predictions. Increased numbers of urban bats did not reflect urbanization-related benefits such as enhanced body condition, reproductive rates, or successful production of juveniles. Instead, bats did best in the transition zone situated between strictly urban and rural areas. Conclusions/Significance: We reject our hypothesis and explore various explanations. One possibility is that urban and rural M. lucifugus exhibit increased use of anthropogenic roosts, as opposed to natural ones, leading to larger maternity colonies and higher population densities and, in turn, increased competition for insect prey. Other possibilities include increased stress, disease transmission and/or impacts of noise on urban bats. Whatever the proximate cause, the combination of greater bat population density with decreased body condition and production of juveniles indicates that Calgary does not represent a population source for Prairie bats. We studied a highly synanthropic species in a system where it could reasonably be expected to respond positively to urbanization, but failed to observe any apparent benefits at the individual level, leading us to propose that urban development may be universally detrimental to bats. © 2011 Coleman, Barclay.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162050
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020483
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0020483.pdf360.55 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons