Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020483
DC FieldValue
dc.titleInfluence of urbanization on demography of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the prairies of North America
dc.contributor.authorColeman J.L.
dc.contributor.authorBarclay R.M.R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-11T08:40:40Z
dc.date.available2019-11-11T08:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationColeman J.L., Barclay R.M.R. (2011). Influence of urbanization on demography of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the prairies of North America. PLoS ONE 6 (5) : e20483. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020483
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162050
dc.description.abstractBackground: We address three key gaps in research on urban wildlife ecology: insufficient attention to (1) grassland biomes, (2) individual- and population-level effects, and (3) vertebrates other than birds. We hypothesized that urbanization in the North American Prairies, by increasing habitat complexity (via the proliferation of vertical structures such as trees and buildings), thereby enhancing the availability of day-roosts, tree cover, and insects, would benefit synanthropic bats, resulting in increased fitness among urban individuals. Methodology/Principal Findings: Over three years, we captured more than 1,600 little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in urban and non-urban riparian sites in and around Calgary, Alberta, Canada. This species dominated bat assemblages throughout our study area, but nowhere more so than in the city. Our data did not support most of our specific predictions. Increased numbers of urban bats did not reflect urbanization-related benefits such as enhanced body condition, reproductive rates, or successful production of juveniles. Instead, bats did best in the transition zone situated between strictly urban and rural areas. Conclusions/Significance: We reject our hypothesis and explore various explanations. One possibility is that urban and rural M. lucifugus exhibit increased use of anthropogenic roosts, as opposed to natural ones, leading to larger maternity colonies and higher population densities and, in turn, increased competition for insect prey. Other possibilities include increased stress, disease transmission and/or impacts of noise on urban bats. Whatever the proximate cause, the combination of greater bat population density with decreased body condition and production of juveniles indicates that Calgary does not represent a population source for Prairie bats. We studied a highly synanthropic species in a system where it could reasonably be expected to respond positively to urbanization, but failed to observe any apparent benefits at the individual level, leading us to propose that urban development may be universally detrimental to bats. © 2011 Coleman, Barclay.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20191101
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbasic reproduction number
dc.subjectbat
dc.subjectbody constitution
dc.subjectCanada
dc.subjectcity
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdemography
dc.subjectdisease transmission
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectinsect
dc.subjectintraspecific competition
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnoise
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectNorth America
dc.subjectpopulation density
dc.subjectpostnatal growth
dc.subjectprairie
dc.subjectprey
dc.subjectreproductive success
dc.subjectriparian ecosystem
dc.subjectrural area
dc.subjectspermatogenesis
dc.subjectstress
dc.subjecturban area
dc.subjecturbanization
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectbat
dc.subjectbody weight
dc.subjectbone
dc.subjectecosystem
dc.subjectgrowth, development and aging
dc.subjecthistology
dc.subjectnewborn
dc.subjectorgan size
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectreproduction
dc.subjectAves
dc.subjectHexapoda
dc.subjectMyotis lucifugus
dc.subjectVertebrata
dc.subjectAlberta
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectAnimals, Newborn
dc.subjectBody Weight
dc.subjectBone and Bones
dc.subjectChiroptera
dc.subjectDemography
dc.subjectEcosystem
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOrgan Size
dc.subjectReproduction
dc.subjectSpermatogenesis
dc.subjectUrbanization
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0020483
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.pagee20483
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0020483.pdf360.55 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons