Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The obligation to participate in biomedical research||Authors:||Schaefer G.O.
|Issue Date:||2009||Citation:||Schaefer G.O., Emanuel E.J., Wertheimer A. (2009). The obligation to participate in biomedical research. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association 302 (1) : 67-72. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.931||Abstract:||The current prevailing view is that participation in biomedical research is above and beyond the call of duty. While some commentators have offered reasons against this, we propose a novel public goods argument for an obligation to participate in biomedical research. Biomedical knowledge is a public good, available to any individual even if that individual does not contribute to it. Participation in research is a critical way to support an important public good. Consequently, all have a duty to participate. The current social norm is that individuals participate only if they have a good reason to do so. The public goods argument implies that individuals should participate unless they have a good reason not to. Such a shift would be of great aid to the progress of biomedical research, eventually making society significantly healthier and longer lived. ©2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.||Source Title:||JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association||URI:||https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/156609||ISSN:||00987484||DOI:||10.1001/jama.2009.931|
|Appears in Collections:||Elements|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|The obligation to participate in biomedical research.pdf||95.41 kB||Adobe PDF|
checked on Jul 20, 2019
checked on Jul 18, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.