Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.836
Title: The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings
Authors: Schaefer G.O. 
Savulescu J.
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Citation: Schaefer G.O., Savulescu J. (2018). The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings. Hastings Center Report 48 (2) : 22-32. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.836
Abstract: During the course of biomedical research, researchers sometimes obtain information on participants that is outside the aim of the study but may nonetheless be relevant to the participants. These incidental findings, as they are known, have been the focus of a substantial amount of discussion in the bioethics literature, and a consensus has begun to emerge about what researchers should do in light of the possibility of incidental findings. A consensus, however, is not necessarily correct. In this article, we address the common view that reporting of incidental findings should be based primarily on the possibility of medical benefit, factoring in the findings’ validity, clinical actionability, and significance to health or reproduction. While such medical beneficence should not be discarded, the need to give proper attention to participants’ autonomy, privacy, and interests (especially considering discussion of participants’ right not to know) suggests an alternative standard for when to report incidental findings: even if they are of no direct medical benefit, incidental findings should be reported based on the extent to which the participant can be expected to comprehend the information. We will offer a preliminary defense of this alternative as best respecting participants’ autonomy and privacy and promoting their interests. However, we acknowledge that the standard would face significant practical barriers, and these barriers lead us to propose a metaconsent addendum that would allow subjects to essentially waive the comprehension standard when resource or other constraints make meeting it impracticable. © 2018 The Hastings Center
Source Title: Hastings Center Report
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/156591
ISSN: 00930334
DOI: 10.1002/hast.836
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
The Right to Know.pdf316.46 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Aug 6, 2022

Page view(s)

236
checked on Aug 4, 2022

Download(s)

1
checked on Aug 4, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.