Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958945
Title: Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games
Authors: Merritt, T.R.
Tan, K.B.
Ong, C.
Thomas, A.
Chuah, T.L.
McGee, K. 
Keywords: Artificial team-mates
Blame
Social actors
Issue Date: 2011
Citation: Merritt, T.R., Tan, K.B., Ong, C., Thomas, A., Chuah, T.L., McGee, K. (2011). Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW : 685-688. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958945
Abstract: In cooperative games that involve team-mates that are controlled by either a computer or another human player, is there a difference in how humans assign credit or blame? There has been some related work on computers as team-mates and credit/blame assignment, but there does not seem to have been work to show whether the belief that a team-mate is human or not affects this. A qualitative study was conducted, in which 16 participants played variations of a team-based game with one of four kinds of team-mates: human (real or perceived) or AI (real or perceived). The two main findings of this research are that the perception of whether a team-mate is human or computer results in different credit/blame assignment and results in inaccurate skill assessment. Copyright 2011 ACM.
Source Title: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124285
ISBN: 9781450305563
DOI: 10.1145/1958824.1958945
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Oct 10, 2021

Page view(s)

82
checked on Oct 14, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.