Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games||Authors:||Merritt, T.R.
|Issue Date:||2011||Citation:||Merritt, T.R., Tan, K.B., Ong, C., Thomas, A., Chuah, T.L., McGee, K. (2011). Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW : 685-688. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958945||Abstract:||In cooperative games that involve team-mates that are controlled by either a computer or another human player, is there a difference in how humans assign credit or blame? There has been some related work on computers as team-mates and credit/blame assignment, but there does not seem to have been work to show whether the belief that a team-mate is human or not affects this. A qualitative study was conducted, in which 16 participants played variations of a team-based game with one of four kinds of team-mates: human (real or perceived) or AI (real or perceived). The two main findings of this research are that the perception of whether a team-mate is human or computer results in different credit/blame assignment and results in inaccurate skill assessment. Copyright 2011 ACM.||Source Title:||Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124285||ISBN:||9781450305563||DOI:||10.1145/1958824.1958945|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Oct 10, 2021
checked on Oct 14, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.