Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two success stories?||Authors:||Bunnell, T.
Ann Miller, M.
|Issue Date:||2013||Citation:||Bunnell, T., Ann Miller, M., Phelps, N.A., Taylor, J. (2013). Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two success stories?. Pacific Affairs 86 (4) : 857-876. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.5509/2013864857||Abstract:||The year 2011 marked the tenth anniversary of the implementation of Indonesia's regional autonomy laws. This paper considers implications of more than a decade of decentralized governance for urban development in Indonesia. After a brief historical overview and consideration of the rationale for political and administrative decentralization in that national context, we examine a range of critical perspectives on policy outcomes. Both media coverage and academic analyses have overwhelmingly cast decentralized governance as it has been implemented in Indonesia in a negative light. As a corrective to this, we have sought to identify positive outcomes and possibilities associated with Indonesia's large-scale decentralization project. In particular, we detail the cases of two cities which have been cast in a variety of rankings and media representations as success stories of urban development through decentralized governance: Solo (or Surakarta as the city is also formally named) and Surabaya. In the final section of the paper, we critically evaluate these two cases and discuss their wider implications. © Pacific Affairs. All rights reserved.||Source Title:||Pacific Affairs||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/116672||ISSN:||0030851X||DOI:||10.5509/2013864857|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.