Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two success stories?|
Ann Miller, M.
|Source:||Bunnell, T., Ann Miller, M., Phelps, N.A., Taylor, J. (2013). Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two success stories?. Pacific Affairs 86 (4) : 857-876. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.5509/2013864857|
|Abstract:||The year 2011 marked the tenth anniversary of the implementation of Indonesia's regional autonomy laws. This paper considers implications of more than a decade of decentralized governance for urban development in Indonesia. After a brief historical overview and consideration of the rationale for political and administrative decentralization in that national context, we examine a range of critical perspectives on policy outcomes. Both media coverage and academic analyses have overwhelmingly cast decentralized governance as it has been implemented in Indonesia in a negative light. As a corrective to this, we have sought to identify positive outcomes and possibilities associated with Indonesia's large-scale decentralization project. In particular, we detail the cases of two cities which have been cast in a variety of rankings and media representations as success stories of urban development through decentralized governance: Solo (or Surakarta as the city is also formally named) and Surabaya. In the final section of the paper, we critically evaluate these two cases and discuss their wider implications. © Pacific Affairs. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Pacific Affairs|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jan 17, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 2, 2018
checked on Jan 15, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.