Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparison of two design methods for PID controllers||Authors:||Hang, C.C.
|Issue Date:||1993||Citation:||Hang, C.C.,Ho, W.K.,Cao, L.S. (1993). Comparison of two design methods for PID controllers. Advances in Instrumentation and Control : International Conference and Exhibition 48 (pt 2) : 959-968. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.||Abstract:||Analytical formulae for designing PI or PID controllers to give specified gain and phase margins have been proposed recently in the literature. The gain and phase margin (GPM) approach gives assurance of not only robustness but also level of performance. Another popular approach with similar emphasis is the internal model control (IMC) method. The two methods require only simple knowledge of the process thus avoiding comprehensive system identification. In this paper, a comparison of the two approaches (GPM and IMC) for designing a PI and a PID controller is made. The comparison shows the difference and the similarity of the two methods and when each method is most suitable to apply.||Source Title:||Advances in Instrumentation and Control : International Conference and Exhibition||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/72530||ISBN:||1556174632||ISSN:||10540032|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Nov 18, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.