Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Revisiting Quistclose trusts, Romalpa clauses and registrable charges: A reply to Ho and Smart||Authors:||Loi, K.C.F.||Issue Date:||2011||Citation:||Loi, K.C.F. (2011). Revisiting Quistclose trusts, Romalpa clauses and registrable charges: A reply to Ho and Smart. Hong Kong Law Journal 41 (PART 2) : 343-360. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.||Abstract:||Romalpa suppliers' proprietary claims over newly manufactured products and sub-sale proceeds have sometimes been characterised as registrable charges under company charges registration legislation and then struck down as void for non-registration. It has been suggested that the same approach ought to be applied to Quistclose trusts. This is a reply to that suggestion.||Source Title:||Hong Kong Law Journal||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45363||ISSN:||03780600|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on May 22, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.