Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45363
| Title: | Revisiting Quistclose trusts, Romalpa clauses and registrable charges: A reply to Ho and Smart | Authors: | Loi, K.C.F. | Issue Date: | 2011 | Citation: | Loi, K.C.F. (2011). Revisiting Quistclose trusts, Romalpa clauses and registrable charges: A reply to Ho and Smart. Hong Kong Law Journal 41 (PART 2) : 343-360. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. | Abstract: | Romalpa suppliers' proprietary claims over newly manufactured products and sub-sale proceeds have sometimes been characterised as registrable charges under company charges registration legislation and then struck down as void for non-registration. It has been suggested that the same approach ought to be applied to Quistclose trusts. This is a reply to that suggestion. | Source Title: | Hong Kong Law Journal | URI: | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45363 | ISSN: | 03780600 |
| Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.