Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45363
Title: Revisiting Quistclose trusts, Romalpa clauses and registrable charges: A reply to Ho and Smart
Authors: Loi, K.C.F. 
Issue Date: 2011
Source: Loi, K.C.F. (2011). Revisiting Quistclose trusts, Romalpa clauses and registrable charges: A reply to Ho and Smart. Hong Kong Law Journal 41 (PART 2) : 343-360. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Romalpa suppliers' proprietary claims over newly manufactured products and sub-sale proceeds have sometimes been characterised as registrable charges under company charges registration legislation and then struck down as void for non-registration. It has been suggested that the same approach ought to be applied to Quistclose trusts. This is a reply to that suggestion.
Source Title: Hong Kong Law Journal
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45363
ISSN: 03780600
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

184
checked on Dec 15, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.