Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Performance effects of formal modeling language differences: A combined abstraction level and construct complexity analysis
Authors: Teo, H.-H. 
Chan, H.C. 
Wei, K.K.
Keywords: Construct complexity
Data model
Human factors
Modeling performance
Issue Date: 2006
Citation: Teo, H.-H.,Chan, H.C.,Wei, K.K. (2006). Performance effects of formal modeling language differences: A combined abstraction level and construct complexity analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49 (2) : 160-175. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Understanding data-modeling performance can provide valuable lessons for the selection, training, research, and development of data models. Data modeling is the process of transforming expressions in loose natural language communications into formal diagrammatic or tabular expressions. While researchers generally agree that abstraction levels can be used to explain general performance differences across models, empirical studies have reported many construct level results that cannot be explained. To explore further explanations, we develop a set of model-specific construct complexity values based on both theoretical and empirical support from complexity research in databases and other areas. We find that abstraction levels and complexity values together are capable of providing a consistent explanation of laboratory experiment data. In our experiment, data were drawn from three models: the relational model, the extended-entity-relationship model, and the object-oriented model. With the newly developed complexity measures, a consistent explanation can be made for findings from other studies which provide sufficient model details for complexity values to be calculated. © 2006 IEEE.
Source Title: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
ISSN: 03611434
DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2006.875079
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


checked on Feb 23, 2021

Page view(s)

checked on Feb 16, 2021

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.