Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13307
Title: Group 4 ITI Consensus Report: Risks and biologic complications associated with implant dentistry
Authors: Heitz‐Mayfield, Lisa J
Aaboe, Merete
Araujo, Mauricio
Carrión, Juan B
Cavalcanti, Raffaele
Cionca, Norbert
Cochran, David
Darby, Ivan
Funakoshi, Eiji
Gierthmuehlen, Petra C
Hashim, Dena
Jahangiri, Leila
Kwon, Yongdae
Lambert, France
Layton, Danielle M
Lorenzana, Eduardo R
McKenna, Gerald
Mombelli, Andrea
Müller, Frauke
Roccuzzo, Mario
Salvi, Giovanni E
Schimmel, Martin
Srinivasan, Murali
Tomasi, Cristiano
Yeo, Alvin 
Issue Date: Oct-2018
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Heitz‐Mayfield, Lisa J, Aaboe, Merete, Araujo, Mauricio, Carrión, Juan B, Cavalcanti, Raffaele, Cionca, Norbert, Cochran, David, Darby, Ivan, Funakoshi, Eiji, Gierthmuehlen, Petra C, Hashim, Dena, Jahangiri, Leila, Kwon, Yongdae, Lambert, France, Layton, Danielle M, Lorenzana, Eduardo R, McKenna, Gerald, Mombelli, Andrea, Müller, Frauke, Roccuzzo, Mario, Salvi, Giovanni E, Schimmel, Martin, Srinivasan, Murali, Tomasi, Cristiano, Yeo, Alvin (2018-10). Group 4 ITI Consensus Report: Risks and biologic complications associated with implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research 29 (S16) : 351-358. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13307
Abstract: AbstractObjectivesThe aim of Working Group 4 was to address topics related to biologic risks and complications associated with implant dentistry. Focused questions on (a) diagnosis of peri‐implantitis, (b) complications associated with implants in augmented sites, (c) outcomes following treatment of peri‐implantitis, and (d) implant therapy in geriatric patients and/or patients with systemic diseases were addressed.Materials and methodsFour systematic reviews formed the basis for discussion in Group 4. Participants developed statements and recommendations determined by group consensus based on the findings of the systematic reviews. These were then presented and accepted following further discussion and modifications as required by the plenary.ResultsBleeding on probing (BOP) alone is insufficient for the diagnosis of peri‐implantitis. The positive predictive value of BOP alone for the diagnosis of peri‐implantitis varies and is dependent on the prevalence of peri‐implantitis within the population. For patients with implants in augmented sites, the prevalence of peri‐implantitis and implant loss is low over the medium to long term. Peri‐implantitis treatment protocols which include individualized supportive care result in high survival of implants after 5 years with about three‐quarters of implants still present. Advanced age alone is not a contraindication for implant therapy. Implant placement in patients with cancer receiving high‐dose antiresorptive therapy is contraindicated due to the associated high risk for complications.ConclusionsDiagnosis of peri‐implantitis requires the presence of BOP as well as progressive bone loss. Prevalence of peri‐implantitis for implants in augmented sites is low. Peri‐implantitis treatment should be followed by individualized supportive care. Implant therapy for geriatric patients is not contraindicated; however, comorbidities and autonomy should be considered.
Source Title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/247162
ISSN: 0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13307
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
COIR - 2018 - Heitz‐Mayfield - Group 4 ITI Consensus Report Risks and biologic complications.pdfPublished version621.4 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download
COIR - 2018 - Heitz‐Mayfield - Group 4 ITI Consensus Report Risks and biologic complications.pdfAccepted version621.4 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.