Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1159/000531016
Title: Quality Assessment of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors: Quek, Jingxuan
Tan, Darren Jun Hao
Chan, Kai En
Lim, Wen Hui
Ng, Cheng Han
Ren, Yi Ping
Koh, Teng Kiat
Teh, Readon
Xiao, Jieling
Fu, Clarissa
Syn, Nicholas
Teng, Margaret
Muthiah, Mark 
Fowler, Kathryn J.
Sirlin, Claude B.
Loomba, Rohit
Huang, Daniel Q. 
Keywords: Liver cancer
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Screening
Ultrasound
Magnetic resonance imaging
Issue Date: 11-May-2023
Publisher: S. Karger AG
Citation: Quek, Jingxuan, Tan, Darren Jun Hao, Chan, Kai En, Lim, Wen Hui, Ng, Cheng Han, Ren, Yi Ping, Koh, Teng Kiat, Teh, Readon, Xiao, Jieling, Fu, Clarissa, Syn, Nicholas, Teng, Margaret, Muthiah, Mark, Fowler, Kathryn J., Sirlin, Claude B., Loomba, Rohit, Huang, Daniel Q. (2023-05-11). Quality Assessment of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Digestive Diseases. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1159/000531016
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Introduction: To achieve early detection and curative treatment options, surveillance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) must remain of quality and without substantial limitations in liver visualization. However, the prevalence of limited liver visualization during HCC surveillance imaging has not been systematically assessed. Utilizing a systematic review and meta-analytic approach, we aimed to determine the prevalence of limited liver visualization during HCC surveillance imaging. Methods: MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases were searched to identify published data on liver visualization limitations of HCC surveillance imaging. An analysis of proportions was pooled using a generalized linear mixed model with Clopper-Pearson intervals. Risk factors were analysed using a generalized mixed model with a logit link and inverse variance weightage. Results: Of 683 records, 10 studies (7,131 patients) met inclusion criteria. Seven studies provided data on liver visualization limitations on ultrasound (US) surveillance exams: prevalence of limited liver visualization was 48.9% (95% CI: 23.5–74.9%) in the overall analysis and 59.2% (95% CI: 24.2–86.9%) in a sensitivity analysis for cirrhotic patients. Meta-regression determined that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease was associated with limited liver visualization on US. Four studies provided data for liver visualization limitations in abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI), with inadequate visualization ranging from 5.8% to 19.0%. One study provided data for complete MRI and none for computed tomography. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of US exams performed for HCC surveillance provide limited liver visualization, especially in cirrhosis, which may hinder detection of small observations. Alternative surveillance strategies including aMRI may be appropriate for patients with limited US visualization.
Source Title: Digestive Diseases
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/243792
ISSN: 0257-2753
1421-9875
DOI: 10.1159/000531016
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
DDI531016.pdf3.05 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons