Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0
Title: Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care
Authors: Ho, Chong Yao
Lim, Nicole-Ann
Rahman, Nur Diana Abdul
Chiam, Min
Zhou, Jamie Xuelian 
Phua, Gillian Li Gek 
Ong, Eng Koon 
Lim, Crystal 
Chowdhury, Anupama Roy 
Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha 
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services
Boundary-crossings
Palliative care
Physician-patient relationship
Doctor-patient relationship
Boundaries
Professional identity formation
Personhood
Professionalism
DECISION-MAKING
RING-THEORY
LIFE
END
PERSONHOOD
SINGAPORE
SEDATION
BURNOUT
FAMILY
Issue Date: 13-Apr-2023
Publisher: BMC
Citation: Ho, Chong Yao, Lim, Nicole-Ann, Rahman, Nur Diana Abdul, Chiam, Min, Zhou, Jamie Xuelian, Phua, Gillian Li Gek, Ong, Eng Koon, Lim, Crystal, Chowdhury, Anupama Roy, Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha (2023-04-13). Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE 22 (1). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0
Abstract: Background: Nurturing effective physician-patient relationships is essential to the provision of patient-centred care. Palliative care physicians may apply boundary-crossings or breaches in professional standards to nurture effective physician-patient relationships. Being highly individualized and shaped by the physician’s narratives, clinical experience, and contextual considerations, boundary-crossings are susceptible to ethical and professional violations. To better appreciate this concept, we employ the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) to map the effects of boundary-crossings on the physician’s belief systems. Methods: As part of the Tool Design SEBA methodology, a Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review was employed to guide the design of a semi-structured interview questionnaire with palliative care physicians. The transcripts were simultaneously content and thematically analysed. The themes and categories identified were combined using the Jigsaw Perspective and the resulting domains formed the basis for the discussion. Results: The domains identified from the 12 semi-structured interviews were catalysts and boundary-crossings. Boundary-crossings attempt to address threats to a physician’s belief systems (catalysts) and are highly individualized. Employ of boundary-crossings depend on the physician’s sensitivity to these ‘catalysts’, their judgement and willingness to act, and their ability to balance various considerations and reflect on their actions and their ramifications. These experiences reshape belief systems, understandings of boundary-crossings and may influence decision-making and practice, underscoring the potential for greater professional breaches when unchecked. Conclusion: Underlining its longitudinal effects, the Krishna Model underscores the importance of longitudinal support, assessment and oversight of palliative care physicians, and lays the foundation for a RToP-based tool to be employed within portfolios.
Source Title: BMC PALLIATIVE CARE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/241806
ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care.pdf1.22 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.