Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0
Title: | Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care | Authors: | Ho, Chong Yao Lim, Nicole-Ann Rahman, Nur Diana Abdul Chiam, Min Zhou, Jamie Xuelian Phua, Gillian Li Gek Ong, Eng Koon Lim, Crystal Chowdhury, Anupama Roy Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha |
Keywords: | Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Health Care Sciences & Services Health Policy & Services Boundary-crossings Palliative care Physician-patient relationship Doctor-patient relationship Boundaries Professional identity formation Personhood Professionalism DECISION-MAKING RING-THEORY LIFE END PERSONHOOD SINGAPORE SEDATION BURNOUT FAMILY |
Issue Date: | 13-Apr-2023 | Publisher: | BMC | Citation: | Ho, Chong Yao, Lim, Nicole-Ann, Rahman, Nur Diana Abdul, Chiam, Min, Zhou, Jamie Xuelian, Phua, Gillian Li Gek, Ong, Eng Koon, Lim, Crystal, Chowdhury, Anupama Roy, Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha (2023-04-13). Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE 22 (1). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0 | Abstract: | Background: Nurturing effective physician-patient relationships is essential to the provision of patient-centred care. Palliative care physicians may apply boundary-crossings or breaches in professional standards to nurture effective physician-patient relationships. Being highly individualized and shaped by the physician’s narratives, clinical experience, and contextual considerations, boundary-crossings are susceptible to ethical and professional violations. To better appreciate this concept, we employ the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) to map the effects of boundary-crossings on the physician’s belief systems. Methods: As part of the Tool Design SEBA methodology, a Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review was employed to guide the design of a semi-structured interview questionnaire with palliative care physicians. The transcripts were simultaneously content and thematically analysed. The themes and categories identified were combined using the Jigsaw Perspective and the resulting domains formed the basis for the discussion. Results: The domains identified from the 12 semi-structured interviews were catalysts and boundary-crossings. Boundary-crossings attempt to address threats to a physician’s belief systems (catalysts) and are highly individualized. Employ of boundary-crossings depend on the physician’s sensitivity to these ‘catalysts’, their judgement and willingness to act, and their ability to balance various considerations and reflect on their actions and their ramifications. These experiences reshape belief systems, understandings of boundary-crossings and may influence decision-making and practice, underscoring the potential for greater professional breaches when unchecked. Conclusion: Underlining its longitudinal effects, the Krishna Model underscores the importance of longitudinal support, assessment and oversight of palliative care physicians, and lays the foundation for a RToP-based tool to be employed within portfolios. | Source Title: | BMC PALLIATIVE CARE | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/241806 | ISSN: | 1472-684X | DOI: | 10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care.pdf | 1.22 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.