Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05907-5
Title: Alendronate use in older patients with reduced renal function: challenges and opportunities in clinical practice
Authors: Naganathar, N
Yau, WP 
Mok, ZH
Tan, ZYF
Chew, STH 
Keywords: Alendronate
Bisphosphonates
Elderly
Osteoporosis
Renal impairment
Aged
Alendronate
Diphosphonates
Humans
Kidney
Renal Insufficiency
Retrospective Studies
Issue Date: 1-Oct-2021
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Citation: Naganathar, N, Yau, WP, Mok, ZH, Tan, ZYF, Chew, STH (2021-10-01). Alendronate use in older patients with reduced renal function: challenges and opportunities in clinical practice. Osteoporosis International 32 (10) : 1981-1988. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05907-5
Abstract: Summary: In this retrospective cohort study, alendronate use among older osteoporosis patients (age>65 years) with reduced renal function (creatinine clearance<35ml/min) was not associated with significant deterioration in renal function from baseline nor increased incidence of osteoporotic fractures or acute kidney injury, compared with patients conservatively managed with only calcium/vitamin D supplementation. Introduction: Oral bisphosphonates are not recommended in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) <35ml/min, although this is not supported by post hoc analyses of pivotal oral bisphosphonate studies. As both osteoporosis and renal insufficiency are more prevalent with advancing age, it is important to determine the safety and efficacy of oral bisphosphonates among these patients. Methods: Patients with CrCl <35ml/min on alendronate (group A, n=98), with CrCl <35ml/min conservatively managed (group B, n=96), and with CrCl ≥35ml/min on alendronate (group C, n=96) were followed up to 22 months. Primary outcomes were mean change in CrCl from baseline in group A compared with groups B and C, respectively. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of osteoporotic fractures and adverse events between groups. Results: There was no significant change in CrCl from baseline when comparing group A (−1.53±6.83ml/min) with group B (0.59±5.17ml/min) (p=0.075), and group A with group C (−3.71±7.54ml/min) (p=0.163). There was no significant increase in incidences of osteoporotic fractures in group A compared with group B (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–6.37) and group A compared with group C (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 0.46–2.89). There was no significant difference in incidences of acute kidney injury (AKI) in group A compared with group B (aRR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20–1.12). Although statistically non-significant, there was an increase in AKI incidence in group A compared with group C (RR 7.84, 95% CI 0.98–62.66). Conclusion: Among patients with CrCl <35ml/min, alendronate therapy was not associated with significant deterioration in renal function from baseline. Although not powered for secondary outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in osteoporotic fracture or AKI incidence between the groups.
Source Title: Osteoporosis International
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/237958
ISSN: 0937-941X
1433-2965
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05907-5
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
s00198-021-05907-5.pdfPublished version633.81 kBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

Published

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.