Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236084
Title: | Malaysian Identity in 2010, Malay Sources | Authors: | Humairah Zainal Kamaludeen Mohamed Nasir |
Keywords: | Alliance with other countries (Regional and international) Communitarian Development Economic growth Educated (Aspirational) Innovative Islam Malay Ethnonational Sovereignty Morally upright Multicultural Multiracial/ racial harmony Nationalistic Patriotic Peaceful Politically stable Progressive nation, including progressive Islam Significant other (British) Skilled workforce Technologically advanced United |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Publisher: | National University of Singapore | Citation: | Humairah Zainal, Kamaludeen Mohamed Nasir (2019). Malaysian Identity in 2010, Malay Sources : 1-20. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. | Abstract: | Malaysia’s predominant discourse of national identity is Malay ethnonational sovereignty. The categories that form part of this discursive formation include Islam and various aspects of Malay identity, such as Malay language. This discourse is characterised by both elite and mass texts, and is distributed across all types of texts. Besides priding itself on Malay ethnonational sovereignty, Malaysia is also perceived as a peaceful leader, a developed and multicultural country, with patriotic and morally upright citizens across the texts sampled. All of these categories are understood positively. On the other hand, the discourse that positions Britain as a negative significant other is based on the two countries’ historical relations, as Britain previously colonised Malaysia for over a century prior to the country’s independence. Overall, there are no challenger discourses for the top 20 identity categories. Instead, what emerged strongly was the dominance of discourses such as social diversity in elite texts, and the absence of the same discourses in mass texts. Categories which form the discourse on development such as economic growth typically appear in both elite and mass texts. However, categories like ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘multiracialism’ are rarely found in mass texts. Hence, it can be argued that while discourses on Malay ethnonational sovereignty, peaceful leader and developed country are formed based on mutual consensus between the state authorities and the public, discourses surrounding social diversity seem to be rather paternalistic. Thus, this category can be understood as a hegemonic state discourse in Malaysia. | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236084 |
Appears in Collections: | Department Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Malaysia Identity Report 2010.pdf | 398.41 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.