Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00438-x
Title: A systematic review and recommendations for prom instruments for older people with frailty in emergency care
Authors: van Oppen, JD
Alshibani, A
Coats, TJ
Graham, B
Holch, P
Lalseta, J
Mackintosh, N
Richardson, V
Riley, P 
Valderas, JM 
Conroy, SP
Keywords: Emergency medicine
Frailty
Geriatrics
Patient satisfaction
Patient-reported outcome measure
Person-centred care
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2022
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Citation: van Oppen, JD, Alshibani, A, Coats, TJ, Graham, B, Holch, P, Lalseta, J, Mackintosh, N, Richardson, V, Riley, P, Valderas, JM, Conroy, SP (2022-12-01). A systematic review and recommendations for prom instruments for older people with frailty in emergency care. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 6 (1) : 30-. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00438-x
Abstract: Introduction: The current service metrics used to evaluate quality in emergency care do not account for specific healthcare outcome goals for older people living with frailty. These have previously been classified under themes of ‘Autonomy’ and ‘Functioning’. There is no person-reported outcome measure (PROM) for older people with frailty and emergency care needs. This study aimed to identify and co-produce recommendations for instruments potentially suitable for use in this population. Methods: In this systematic review, we searched six databases for PROMs used between 2010 and 2021 by older people living with frailty receiving acute hospital care. Studies were reviewed against predefined eligibility criteria and appraised for quality using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Data were extracted to map instrument constructs against an existing framework of acute healthcare outcome goals. Instrument face and content validity were assessed by lay collaborators. Recommendations for instruments with potential emergency care suitability were formed through co-production. Results: Of 9392 unique citations screened, we appraised the full texts of 158 studies. Nine studies were identified, evaluating nine PROMs. Quality of included studies ranged from ‘doubtful’ to ‘very good’. Most instruments had strong evidence for measurement properties. PROMs mainly assessed ‘Functioning’ constructs, with limited coverage of ‘Autonomy’. Five instruments were considered too burdensome for the emergency care setting or too specific for older people living with frailty. Conclusions: Four PROMs were recommended as potentially suitable for further validation with older people with frailty and emergency care needs: COOP/WONCA charts, EuroQol, McGill Quality of Life (Expanded), and Palliative care Outcome Scale.
Source Title: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/234457
ISSN: 2509-8020
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00438-x
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
A systematic review and recommendations for prom instruments for older people with frailty in emergency care.pdfPublished version1.23 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Jan 22, 2023

Page view(s)

22
checked on Jan 26, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Jan 26, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.