Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2021.07.008
Title: Osteochondral tissue engineering: Perspectives for clinical application and preclinical development
Authors: Ai, Chengchong
Lee, Yee Han Dave
Tan, Xuan Hao 
Tan, Si Heng Sharon
Hui, James Hoi Po 
Goh, James Cho-Hong 
Keywords: Animal experiment
Osteochondral regeneration
Scaffold
Subchondral bone
Issue Date: 1-Sep-2021
Publisher: Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd
Citation: Ai, Chengchong, Lee, Yee Han Dave, Tan, Xuan Hao, Tan, Si Heng Sharon, Hui, James Hoi Po, Goh, James Cho-Hong (2021-09-01). Osteochondral tissue engineering: Perspectives for clinical application and preclinical development. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation 30 : 93-102. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2021.07.008
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Abstract: The treatment of osteochondral defects (OCD) remains challenging. Among currently available surgical treatments for OCDs, scaffold-based treatments are promising to regenerate the osteochondral unit. However, there is still no consensus regarding the clinical effectiveness of these scaffold-based therapies for OCDs. Previous reviews have described the gradient physiological characteristics of osteochondral tissue and gradient scaffold design for OCD, tissue engineering strategies, biomaterials, and fabrication technologies. However, the discussion on bridging the gap between the clinical need and preclinical research is still limited, on which we focus in the present review, providing an insight into what is currently lacking in tissue engineering methods that failed to yield satisfactory outcomes, and what is needed to further improve these techniques. Currently available surgical treatments for OCDs are firstly summarized, followed by a comprehensive review on experimental animal studies in recent 5 years on osteochondral tissue engineering. The review will then conclude with what is currently lacking in these animal studies and the recommendations that would help enlighten the community in developing more clinically relevant implants. The translational potential of this article: This review is attempting to summarize the lessons from clinical and preclinical failures, providing an insight into what is currently lacking in TE methods that failed to yield satisfactory outcomes, and what is needed to further improve these implants. © 2021 The Authors
Source Title: Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233648
ISSN: 2214-031X
DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.07.008
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_jot_2021_07_008.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons