Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258098
Title: | Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 | Authors: | Vijaykumar, Santosh Raamkumar, Aravind Sesagiri McCarty, Kristofor Mutumbwa, Cuthbert Mustafa, Jawwad Au, Cyndy |
Issue Date: | 21-Oct-2021 | Publisher: | Public Library of Science | Citation: | Vijaykumar, Santosh, Raamkumar, Aravind Sesagiri, McCarty, Kristofor, Mutumbwa, Cuthbert, Mustafa, Jawwad, Au, Cyndy (2021-10-21). Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017. PLoS ONE 16 (10-Oct) : e0258098. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258098 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International | Abstract: | We build on recent examinations questioning the quality of online information about probiotic products by studying the themes of content, detecting virtual communities and identifying key influencers in social media using data science techniques. We conducted topic modelling (n = 36,715 tweets) and longitudinal social network analysis (n = 17,834 tweets) of probiotic chatter on Twitter from 2009-17. We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to build the topic models and network analysis tool Gephi for building yearly graphs. We identified the top 10 topics of probiotics-related communication on Twitter and a constant rise in communication activity. However the number of communities grew consistently to peak in 2014 before dipping and levelling off by 2017. While several probiotics industry actors appeared and disappeared during this period, the influence of one specific actor rose from a hub initially to an authority in the latter years. With multi-brand advertising and probiotics promotions mostly occupying the Twitter chatter, scientists, journalists, or policymakers exerted minimal influence in these communities. Consistent with previous research, we find that probiotics- related content on social media veers towards promotions and benefits. Probiotic industry actors maintain consistent presence on Twitter while transitioning from hubs to authorities over time; scientific entities assume an authoritative role without much engagement. The involvement of scientific, journalistic or regulatory stakeholders will help create a balanced informational environment surrounding probiotic products. © 2021 Vijaykumar et al. | Source Title: | PLoS ONE | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233117 | ISSN: | 1932-6203 | DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0258098 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_1371_journal_pone_0258098.pdf | 1.73 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License