Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00874-8
Title: Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine-alcohol versus chlorhexidine-alcohol for surgical skin preparation on the aerobic and anaerobic skin flora of the shoulder region
Authors: Dörfel, Dorothea
Maiwald, Matthias 
Daeschlein, Georg
Müller, Gerald
Hudek, Robert
Assadian, Ojan
Kampf, Gunter
Kohlmann, Thomas
Harnoss, Julian Camill
Kramer, Axel
Keywords: Alcohol
Chlorhexidine
Povidone-iodine
Shoulder surgery
Skin antisepsis
Issue Date: 22-Jan-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Citation: Dörfel, Dorothea, Maiwald, Matthias, Daeschlein, Georg, Müller, Gerald, Hudek, Robert, Assadian, Ojan, Kampf, Gunter, Kohlmann, Thomas, Harnoss, Julian Camill, Kramer, Axel (2021-01-22). Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine-alcohol versus chlorhexidine-alcohol for surgical skin preparation on the aerobic and anaerobic skin flora of the shoulder region. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 10 (1) : 17. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00874-8
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Cutibacterium acnes is part of the anaerobic skin microbiome and resides in deeper skin layers. The organism is an agent of surgical site infections (SSI) in shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that prolonged skin preparation with an agent that penetrates deeply into the skin would be beneficial. Thus, we compared two classes of antiseptics, each combined with alcohol, each applied with two different contact times. Methods: Using a cross-over arrangement, shoulders of 16 healthy volunteers were treated for 2.5 min (standard) or 30 min (prolonged) with alcohol-based chlorhexidine (CHG-ALC) or alcohol-based povidone-iodine (PVP-I-ALC). Skin sites were sampled before, immediately after, and 3 h after treatment, using a standardized cup-scrub technique. Results: Aerobic skin flora was reduced more effectively by PVP-I-ALC than by CHG-ALC after 2.5 min application and immediate sampling (reduction factor [RF] 2.55 ± 0.75 vs. 1.94 ± 0.91, p = 0.04), but not after prolonged contact times and 3-h sampling. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were completely eliminated after PVP-I-ALC application, but still recovered from 4 of 32 samples after CHG-ALC application. Anaerobic flora was reduced more effectively by PVP-I-ALC than CHG-ALC after standard (RF 3.96 ± 1.46 vs. 1.74 ± 1.24, p < 0.01) and prolonged (RF 3.14 ± 1.20 vs. 1.38 ± 1.16, p < 0.01) contact times and immediate sampling, but not after 3-h sampling. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: PVP-I-ALC showed marginal benefits concerning the aerobic flora, but more substantial benefits over CHG-ALC concerning the anaerobic flora of the shoulder. Standard and prolonged contact times showed superiority for PVP-I-ALC for anaerobic flora at all immediate sampling points, but missed significance at 3-h sampling. The results underscore the need for protection against C. acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci in orthopaedic surgery. The clinical relevance of these findings, however, should be studied with SSI as an endpoint. © 2021, The Author(s).
Source Title: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232771
ISSN: 2047-2994
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00874-8
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s13756-020-00874-8.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons