Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7075
Title: Insect morphometry is reproducible under average investigation standards
Authors: Cs?sz, S.
Seifert, Bernhard
Mikó, I.
Boudinot, Brendon E.
Borowiec, Marek L.
Fisher, Brian L.
Prebus, Matthew
Puniamoorthy, Jayanthi 
Rakotonirina, Jean-Claude
Rasoamanana, Nicole
Schultz, Roland
Trietsch, Carolyn
Ulmer, Jonah M.
Elek, Zoltan
Keywords: entomology
measurement error
morphology
repeatability
species delimitation
taxonomy
Issue Date: 8-Dec-2020
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Citation: Cs?sz, S., Seifert, Bernhard, Mikó, I., Boudinot, Brendon E., Borowiec, Marek L., Fisher, Brian L., Prebus, Matthew, Puniamoorthy, Jayanthi, Rakotonirina, Jean-Claude, Rasoamanana, Nicole, Schultz, Roland, Trietsch, Carolyn, Ulmer, Jonah M., Elek, Zoltan (2020-12-08). Insect morphometry is reproducible under average investigation standards. Ecology and Evolution 11 (1) : 547-559. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7075
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Morphometric research is being applied to a growing number and variety of organisms. Discoveries achieved via morphometric approaches are often considered highly transferable, in contrast to the tacit and idiosyncratic interpretation of discrete character states. The reliability of morphometric workflows in insect systematics has never been a subject of focused research, but such studies are sorely needed. In this paper, we assess the reproducibility of morphometric studies of ants where the mode of data collection is a shared routine. We compared datasets generated by eleven independent gaugers, that is, collaborators, who measured 21 continuous morphometric traits on the same pool of individuals according to the same protocol. The gaugers possessed a wide range of morphometric skills, had varying expertise among insect groups, and differed in their facility with measuring equipment. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to calculate repeatability and reproducibility values (i.e., intra- and intergauger agreements), and we performed a multivariate permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using the Morosita index of dissimilarity with 9,999 iterations. The calculated average measure of intraclass correlation coefficients of different gaugers ranged from R = 0.784 to R = 0.9897 and a significant correlation was found between the repeatability and the morphometric skills of gaugers (p = 0.016). There was no significant association with the magnification of the equipment in the case of these rather small ants. The intergauger agreement, that is the reproducibility, varied between R = 0.872 and R = 0.471 (mean R = 0.690), but all gaugers arrived at the same two-species conclusion. A PERMANOVA test revealed no significant gauger effect on species identity (R2 = 0.69, p = 0.58). Our findings show that morphometric studies are reproducible when observers follow the standard protocol; hence, morphometric findings are widely transferable and will remain a valuable data source for alpha taxonomy. © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Source Title: Ecology and Evolution
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232562
ISSN: 2045-7758
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7075
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1002_ece3_7075.pdf1.28 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Dec 7, 2022

Page view(s)

15
checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons