Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Return of individual research results: What do participants prefer and expect?
Authors: Sayeed, Sabina 
Califf, Robert
Green, Robert
Wong, Celeste
Mahaffey, Kenneth
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
Mega, Jessica
Patrick-Lake, Bray
Frazier, Kaylyn
Pignone, Michael
Hernandez, Adrian
Shah, Svati H.
Fan, Alice C.
Krüg, Sarah
Shaack, Terry
Shore, Scarlet
Spielman, Susie
Eckstrand, Julie
Wong, Charlene A.
Issue Date: 29-Jul-2021
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Citation: Sayeed, Sabina, Califf, Robert, Green, Robert, Wong, Celeste, Mahaffey, Kenneth, Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam, Mega, Jessica, Patrick-Lake, Bray, Frazier, Kaylyn, Pignone, Michael, Hernandez, Adrian, Shah, Svati H., Fan, Alice C., Krüg, Sarah, Shaack, Terry, Shore, Scarlet, Spielman, Susie, Eckstrand, Julie, Wong, Charlene A. (2021-07-29). Return of individual research results: What do participants prefer and expect?. PLoS ONE 16 (7-Jul) : e0254153. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Newer data platforms offer increased opportunity to share multidimensional health data with research participants, but the preferences of participants for which data to receive and how is evolving. Our objective is to describe the preferences and expectations of participants for the return of individual research results within Project Baseline Health Study (PBHS). The PBHS is an ongoing, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study with data from four initial enrollment sites. PBHS participants are recruited from the general population along with groups enriched for heart disease and cancer disease risk. Cross-sectional data on return of results were collected in 2017–2018 from an (1) in-person enrollment survey (n = 1,890), (2) benchmark online survey (n = 1,059), and (3) participant interviews (n = 21). The main outcomes included (1) preferences for type of information to be added next to returned results, (2) participant plans for sharing returned results with a non-study clinician, and (3) choice to opt-out of receiving genetic results. Results were compared by sociodemographic characteristics. Enrollment and benchmark survey respondents were 57.1% and 53.5% female, and 60.0% and 66.2% white, respectively. Participants preferred the following data types be added to returned results in the future: genetics (29.9%), heart imaging, (16.4%), study watch (15.8%), and microbiome (13.3%). Older adults (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41–0.87) were less likely to want their genetic results returned next. Forty percent of participants reported that they would not share all returned results with their non–study clinicians. Black (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43–0.95) and Asian (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.73) participants were less likely, and older participants more likely (OR 1.45–1.61), to plan to share all results with their clinician than their counterparts. At enrollment, 5.8% of participants opted out of receiving their genetics results. The study showed that substantial heterogeneity existed in participant’s preferences and expectations for return of results, and variations were related to sociodemographic characteristics. © 2021 Sayeed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254153
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0254153.pdf559.42 kBAdobe PDF




checked on Dec 7, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons