Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Variations in regulations to control standards for training and licensing of physicians: a multi-country comparison
Authors: Aftab, Wafa
Khan, Mishal
Rego, Sonia
Chavan, Nishant
Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah
Sharma, Isha
Wu, Shishi 
Zeinali, Zahra
Hasan, Rumina
Siddiqi, Sameen
Keywords: Governance
Human resources
Medical training
Issue Date: 23-Jul-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Citation: Aftab, Wafa, Khan, Mishal, Rego, Sonia, Chavan, Nishant, Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah, Sharma, Isha, Wu, Shishi, Zeinali, Zahra, Hasan, Rumina, Siddiqi, Sameen (2021-07-23). Variations in regulations to control standards for training and licensing of physicians: a multi-country comparison. Human Resources for Health 19 (1) : 91. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: To strengthen health systems, the shortage of physicians globally needs to be addressed. However, efforts to increase the numbers of physicians must be balanced with controls on medical education imparted and the professionalism of doctors licensed to practise medicine. Methods: We conducted a multi-country comparison of mandatory regulations and voluntary guidelines to control standards for medical education, clinical training, licensing and re-licensing of doctors. We purposively selected seven case-study countries with differing health systems and income levels: Canada, China, India, Iran, Pakistan, UK and USA. Using an analytical framework to assess regulations at four sequential stages of the medical education to relicensing pathway, we extracted information from: systematically collected scientific and grey literature and online news articles, websites of regulatory bodies in study countries, and standardised input from researchers and medical professionals familiar with rules in the study countries. Results: The strictest controls we identified to reduce variations in medical training, licensing and re-licensing of doctors between different medical colleges, and across different regions within a country, include: medical education delivery restricted to public sector institutions; uniform, national examinations for medical college admission and licensing; and standardised national requirements for relicensing linked to demonstration of competence. However, countries analysed used different combinations of controls, balancing the strictness of controls across the four stages. Conclusions: While there is no gold standard model for medical education and practise regulation, examining the combinations of controls used in different countries enables identification of innovations and regulatory approaches to address specific contextual challenges, such as decentralisation of regulations to sub-national bodies or privatisation of medical education. Looking at the full continuum from medical education to licensing is valuable to understand how countries balance the strictness of controls at different stages. Further research is needed to understand how regulating authorities, policy-makers and medical associations can find the right balance of standardisation and context-based flexibility to produce well-rounded physicians. © 2021, The Author(s).
Source Title: Human Resources for Health
ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00629-5
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12960-021-00629-5.pdf1.14 MBAdobe PDF



Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons