Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06033-z
DC FieldValue
dc.titleValidation of aortic valve pressure gradient quantification using semi-automated 4D flow CMR pipeline
dc.contributor.authorGrafton-Clarke, C
dc.contributor.authorNjoku, P
dc.contributor.authorAben, JP
dc.contributor.authorLedoux, L
dc.contributor.authorZhong, L
dc.contributor.authorWestenberg, J
dc.contributor.authorSwift, A
dc.contributor.authorArcher, G
dc.contributor.authorWild, J
dc.contributor.authorHose, R
dc.contributor.authorFlather, M
dc.contributor.authorVassiliou, VS
dc.contributor.authorGarg, P
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T08:12:23Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T08:12:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-01
dc.identifier.citationGrafton-Clarke, C, Njoku, P, Aben, JP, Ledoux, L, Zhong, L, Westenberg, J, Swift, A, Archer, G, Wild, J, Hose, R, Flather, M, Vassiliou, VS, Garg, P (2022-12-01). Validation of aortic valve pressure gradient quantification using semi-automated 4D flow CMR pipeline. BMC Research Notes 15 (1) : 151-. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06033-z
dc.identifier.issn17560500
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/226754
dc.description.abstractObjective: Doppler echocardiographic aortic valve peak velocity and peak pressure gradient assessment across the aortic valve (AV) is the mainstay for diagnosing aortic stenosis. Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) is emerging as a valuable diagnostic tool for estimating the peak pressure drop across the aortic valve, but assessment remains cumbersome. We aimed to validate a novel semi-automated pipeline 4D flow CMR method of assessing peak aortic value pressure gradient (AVPG) using the commercially available software solution, CAAS MR Solutions, against invasive angiographic methods. Results: We enrolled 11 patients with severe AS on echocardiography from the EurValve programme. All patients had pre-intervention doppler echocardiography, invasive cardiac catheterisation with peak pressure drop assessment across the AV and 4D flow CMR. The peak AVPG was 51.9 ± 35.2 mmHg using the invasive pressure drop method and 52.2 ± 29.2 mmHg for the 4D flow CMR method (semi-automated pipeline), with good correlation between the two methods (r = 0.70, p = 0.017). Assessment of AVPG by 4D flow CMR using the novel semi-automated pipeline method shows excellent agreement to invasive assessment when compared to doppler-based methods and advocate for its use as complementary to echocardiography.
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectAortic stenosis
dc.subjectCardiac MRI
dc.subjectValidation
dc.subjectAortic Valve
dc.subjectAortic Valve Stenosis
dc.subjectBlood Flow Velocity
dc.subjectEchocardiography
dc.subjectEchocardiography, Doppler
dc.subjectHumans
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-06-07T06:06:16Z
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1186/s13104-022-06033-z
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Research Notes
dc.description.volume15
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page151-
dc.published.stateAccepted
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Validation of aortic valve pressure gradient quantification using semi-automated 4D flow CMR pipeline.pdfPublished version1.17 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.