Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors: Romeo, Amelia
Edney, Sarah 
Plotnikoff, Ronald
Curtis, Rachel
Ryan, Jillian
Sanders, Ilea
Crozier, Alyson
Maher, Carol
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Health Care Sciences & Services
Medical Informatics
physical activity
mobile phone
mobile apps
health behavior
systematic review
Issue Date: 19-Mar-2019
Citation: Romeo, Amelia, Edney, Sarah, Plotnikoff, Ronald, Curtis, Rachel, Ryan, Jillian, Sanders, Ilea, Crozier, Alyson, Maher, Carol (2019-03-19). Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH 21 (3). ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Background: Smartphone apps are a promising tool for delivering accessible and appealing physical activity interventions. Given the large growth of research in this field, there are now enough studies using the "gold standard" of experimental design-the randomized controlled trial design-and employing objective measurements of physical activity, to support a meta-analysis of these scientifically rigorous studies. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of smartphone apps for increasing objectively measured physical activity in adults. Methods: A total of 7 electronic databases (EMBASE, EmCare, MEDLINE, Scopus, Sport Discus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched from 2007 to January 2018. Following the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study Design format, studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials involving adults, used a smartphone app as the primary or sole component of the physical activity intervention, used a no- or minimal-intervention control condition, and measured objective physical activity either in the form of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity minutes or steps. Study quality was assessed using a 25-item tool based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist. A meta-analysis of study effects was conducted using a random effects model approach. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine whether intervention effectiveness differed on the basis of intervention length, target behavior (physical activity alone vs physical activity in combination with other health behaviors), or target population (general adult population vs specific health populations). Results: Following removal of duplicates, a total of 6170 studies were identified from the original database searches. Of these, 9 studies, involving a total of 1740 participants, met eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 studies could be included in a meta-analysis of the effects of physical activity apps on steps per day. In comparison with the control conditions, smartphone apps produced a nonsignificant (P=.19) increase in participants' average steps per day, with a mean difference of 476.75 steps per day (95% CI -229.57 to 1183.07) between groups. Sensitivity analyses suggested that physical activity programs with a duration of less than 3 months were more effective than apps evaluated across more than 3 months (P=.01), and that physical activity apps that targeted physical activity in isolation were more effective than apps that targeted physical activity in combination with diet (P=.04). Physical activity app effectiveness did not appear to differ on the basis of target population. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides modest evidence supporting the effectiveness of smartphone apps to increase physical activity. To date, apps have been most effective in the short term (eg, up to 3 months). Future research is needed to understand the time course of intervention effects and to investigate strategies to sustain intervention effects over time.
ISSN: 14388871
DOI: 10.2196/12053
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Romeo et al. 2019 JMIR smartphone apps and PA - systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf569.68 kBAdobe PDF




checked on Oct 1, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on Oct 6, 2022


checked on Oct 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.