Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.2009432
Title: Do CO2 emission trading schemes deliver co-benefits? Evidence from Shanghai
Authors: Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo 
Lili Li 
Ping Qin
Xiao-Bing Zhang
Keywords: Air pollution abatement
co-benefits
CO2 emissions
emissions trading schemes
policy design and implementation
Issue Date: 24-Dec-2021
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo, Lili Li, Ping Qin, Xiao-Bing Zhang (2021-12-24). Do CO2 emission trading schemes deliver co-benefits? Evidence from Shanghai. Climate Policy 22 (1) : 64-76. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.2009432
Abstract: While ex-ante evaluations of climate mitigation policies predict that co-benefits of improved air quality will enable the aggregate benefits of climate mitigation policies to outweigh their costs, there is little empirical evidence to support this assertion. In this study, we use data on weekly smokestack emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) from firms participating in Shanghai’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions trading scheme (ETS) to deliver one of the first ex-post evaluations on the co-benefits of China’s ETS. Using a panel-regression model in which all firms’ characteristics and seasonal effects are controlled, we find a significant negative association between CO2 emissions prices and industrial SO2 emissions (elasticity of −0.13). A closer examination reveals that most of these effects were driven by specific sectors (iron and steel) and during months in which firms were required to balance their annual CO2 emissions. To ensure our results are not driven by confounding factors and our model’s assumptions, we conducted several falsification checks using SO2 emissions from non-ETS firms and firms from a nearby city, using various model specifications. Our findings suggest that co-benefits from climate mitigation policies should not be taken for granted, and that policy designs and types of sector sources of emissions are important determinants of co-benefits. Key policy insights The study provides empirical evidence for air pollution co-benefits of a CO2 ETS using weekly smokestack-level data from Shanghai, China Evidence from the Shanghai ETS shows that a 1% increase in CO2 prices in Shanghai is associated with a 0.13% decrease in SO2 emissions These co-benefits, however, are limited to specific sectors (e.g. ferrous metals), and are not found in other major CO2 emitting sources or sectors (e.g. power utilities) The relationship between CO2 prices and co-benefits is also stronger during months in which firms are required to balance their annual CO2 emissions using permits.
Source Title: Climate Policy
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/215758
ISSN: 1469-3062
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.2009432
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10.108014693062.2021.2009432.zip1.11 MBZIP

CLOSED

None
Tan Soo Jie Sheng_Do CO2 emissions trading schemes deliver co-benefits_ Evidence from Shanghai.pdf1.47 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Feb 3, 2023

Page view(s)

92
checked on Feb 2, 2023

Download(s)

5
checked on Feb 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.