Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.02.001
Title: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole pelvis irradiation in prostate cancer: A dosimetric and plan robustness study between photons and protons
Authors: Ong, A.L.K.
Ang, K.W.
Master, Z.
Wong, S.M.M.
Tuan, J.K.L. 
Keywords: IMPT
PBS
Pelvic lymph nodes
Prostate cancer
Robust analysis
VMAT
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Citation: Ong, A.L.K., Ang, K.W., Master, Z., Wong, S.M.M., Tuan, J.K.L. (2018). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole pelvis irradiation in prostate cancer: A dosimetric and plan robustness study between photons and protons. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology 6 : Nov-19. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.02.001
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric impact and plan robustness of using Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) in patients that requires prophylactic pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) irradiation for prostate cancer. Material and methods: Five intermediate to high-risk prostate patients previously treated using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), were selected for this study. Comparative proton radiotherapy plans were generated, where a three-field intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan was for the phase 1 planning target volume (PTV1) with PLNs. A technique with two posterior oblique fields using single field uniform dose (SFUD) was used for phase 2 (PTV2) volume, that comprises of the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles (Pro + proxSVs). Plan evaluation was performed on PTV coverage and dose to the organs at risk (OARs) using VMAT plans as a baseline (BL). Robust analysis on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage for the PBS plans was simulated with a 3 and 5 mm setup errors and a 3.5% range uncertainty. Results: For target coverage, PTV1 and PTV2 showed negligible differences with a comparable homogeneity index (HI) values for both modalities. Proton plans produced a statistically significant lower mean dose to the bladder (32.5 Gy(RBE) vs. 46.5 Gy) and rectum (33.6 Gy(RBE) vs. 42.7 Gy). Dose to the bladder and rectum was equivalent at the high dose region. For the bowel cavity, the mean dose for proton plans were 45% lower compared to VMAT plans. Similarly, proton plans were able to achieve an overall reduction in integral dose for both treatment phase. CTV coverage remained high with all the simulated setup and range errors. Conclusions: Proposed beam geometries for PTV1 and PTV2 proton plans presented good treatment accuracy with similar target coverage as the VMAT plans. Better sparing of OARs was achieved at the low-medium dose region for the proton plans. © 2018
Source Title: Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/206446
ISSN: 2405-6324
DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.02.001
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_tipsro_2018_02_001.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Jan 18, 2022

Page view(s)

4
checked on Jan 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons