Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0918-8
Title: Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque and myocardial scar tissue in acute myocardial infarction
Authors: Marchesseau, Stephanie 
Seneviratna, Aruni
Sjoholm, A Therese
Qin, Daphne Liang
Ho, Jamie XM
Hausenloy, Derek J
Townsend, David W
Richards, A Mark
Totman, John J
Chan, Mark YY
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
PET imaging
Infarction
Myocardial
Magnetic resonance imaging
Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque
RUPTURE
RECONSTRUCTION
CALCIFICATION
DISEASE
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2018
Publisher: SPRINGER
Citation: Marchesseau, Stephanie, Seneviratna, Aruni, Sjoholm, A Therese, Qin, Daphne Liang, Ho, Jamie XM, Hausenloy, Derek J, Townsend, David W, Richards, A Mark, Totman, John J, Chan, Mark YY (2018-12-01). Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque and myocardial scar tissue in acute myocardial infarction. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY 25 (6) : 2001-2011. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0918-8
Abstract: Background: Following an acute coronary syndrome, combined CT and PET with 18F-NaF can identify coronary atherosclerotic plaques that have ruptured or eroded. However, the processes behind 18F-NaF uptake in vulnerable plaques remain unclear. Methods and Results: Ten patients with STEMI were scanned after 18F-NaF injection, for 75 minutes in a Siemens PET/MR scanner using delayed enhancement (LGE). They were then scanned in a Siemens PET/CT scanner for 10 minutes. Tissue-to-background ratio (TBR) was compared between the culprit lesion in the IRA and remote non-culprit lesions in an effort to independently validate prior studies. Additionally, we performed a proof-of-principle study comparing TBR in scar tissue and remote myocardium using LGE images and PET/MR or PET/CT data. From the 33 coronary lesions detected on PET/CT, TBRs for culprit lesions were higher than for non-culprit lesions (TBR = 2.11 ± 0.45 vs 1.46 ± 0.48; P < 0.001). Interestingly, the TBR measured on the PET/CT was higher for infarcted myocardium than for remote myocardium (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 vs 0.71 ± 0.05; P = 0.003). These results were confirmed using the PET/MR data (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 for scar, TBR = 0.71 ± 0.06 for healthy myocardium, P = 0.03). Conclusions: We confirmed the potential of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging to detect vulnerable coronary lesions. Moreover, we demonstrated proof-of-principle that 18F-NaF concurrently detects myocardial scar tissue.
Source Title: JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/206013
ISSN: 10713581
15326551
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0918-8
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Hybrid PET CT and PET MRI imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque and myocardial scar tissue in acute myocardial infarction.pdfPublished version1.31 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.