Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw226
Title: Geographic variations in the PARADIGM-HF heart failure trial
Authors: Kristensen, SL
Martinez, F
Jhund, PS
Arango, JL
Belohlavek, J
Boytsov, S
Cabrera, W
Gomez, E
Hagege, AA
Huang, J
Kiatchoosakun, S
Kim, KS
Mendoza, I
Senni, M
Squire, IB
Vinereanu, D
Wong, RCC 
Gong, J
Lefkowitz, MP
Rizkala, AR
Rouleau, JL
Shi, VC
Solomon, SD
Swedberg, K
Zile, MR
Packer, M
McMurray, JJV
Keywords: Clinical trial
Geographical variation
Heart failure
Prognosis
Treatment outcome
Aged
Asia
Europe
Heart Failure
Hospitalization
Humans
Middle Aged
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2016
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation: Kristensen, SL, Martinez, F, Jhund, PS, Arango, JL, Belohlavek, J, Boytsov, S, Cabrera, W, Gomez, E, Hagege, AA, Huang, J, Kiatchoosakun, S, Kim, KS, Mendoza, I, Senni, M, Squire, IB, Vinereanu, D, Wong, RCC, Gong, J, Lefkowitz, MP, Rizkala, AR, Rouleau, JL, Shi, VC, Solomon, SD, Swedberg, K, Zile, MR, Packer, M, McMurray, JJV (2016-11-01). Geographic variations in the PARADIGM-HF heart failure trial. European Heart Journal 37 (41) : 3167-3174. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw226
Abstract: Aims The globalization of clinical trials has highlighted geographic variations in patient characteristics, event rates, and treatment effects. We investigated these further in PARADIGM-HF, the largest and most globally representative trial in heart failure (HF) to date. Methods and results We looked at five regions: North America (NA) 602 (8%), Western Europe (WE) 1680 (20%), Central/Eastern Europe/ Russia (CEER) 2762 (33%), Latin America (LA) 1433 (17%), and Asia-Pacific (AP) 1487 (18%). Notable differences included: WE patients (mean age 68 years) and NA (65 years) were older than AP (58 years) and LA (63 years) and had more coronary disease; NA and CEER patients had the worst signs, symptoms, and functional status. North American patients were the most likely to have a defibrillating-device (54 vs. 2% AP) and least likely prescribed a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (36 vs. 65% LA). Other evidence-based therapies were used most frequently in NA and WE. Rates of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospitalization (per 100 patient-years) varied among regions: NA 13.6 (95% CI 11.7-15.7) WE 9.6 (8.6-10.6), CEER 12.3 (11.4-13.2), LA 11.2 (10.0-12.5), and AP 12.5 (11.3-13.8). After adjustment for prognostic variables, relative to NA, the risk of CV death was higher in LA and AP and the risk of HF hospitalization lower in WE. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was consistent across regions. Conclusion There were many regional differences in PARADIGM-HF, including in age, symptoms, comorbidity, background therapy, and event-rates, although these did not modify the benefit of sacubitril/valsartan. Clinical trial registration URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01035255.
Source Title: European Heart Journal
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/205915
ISSN: 0195668X
15229645
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw226
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Geographic variations in the PARADIGM-HF heart failure trial.pdf294.59 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.