Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01031-5
Title: Where we eat is who we are: a survey of food-related travel patterns to Singapore’s hawker centers, food courts and coffee shops
Authors: Tan, S.B. 
Arcaya, M.
Keywords: Food environments
Food related travel
Travel mode
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Citation: Tan, S.B., Arcaya, M. (2020). Where we eat is who we are: a survey of food-related travel patterns to Singapore’s hawker centers, food courts and coffee shops. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 17 (1) : 132. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01031-5
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: The development of empirically-grounded policies to change the obesogenic nature of urban environment has been impeded by limited, inconclusive evidence of the link between food environments, dietary behaviors, and health-related outcomes, in part due to inconsistent methods of classifying and analyzing food environments. This study explores how individual and built environment characteristics may be associated with how far and long people travel to food venues,that can serve as a starting point for further policy-oriented research to develop a more nuanced, context-specific delineations of ‘food environments’ in an urban Asian context. Methods: Five hundred twenty nine diners in eight different neighborhoods in Singapore were surveyed about how far and long they travelled to their meal venues, and by what mode. We then examined how respondents’ food-related travel differed by socioeconomic characteristics, as well as objectively-measured built environment characteristics at travel origin and destination, using linear regression models. Results: Low-income individuals expended more time traveling to meal destinations than high-income individuals, largely because they utilized slower modes like walking rather than driving. Those travelling from areas with high food outlet density travelled shorter distances and times than those from food-sparse areas, while those seeking meals away from their home and work anchor points had lower thresholds for travel. Respondents also travelled longer distances to food-dense locations, compared to food-sparse locations. Conclusion: Those seeking to improve food environments of poor individuals should consider studying an intervention radius pegged to typical walking distances, or ways to improve their transport options as a starting point. Policy-focused research on food environments should also be sensitive to locational characteristics, such as food outlet densities and land use. © 2020, The Author(s).
Source Title: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/199526
ISSN: 1479-5868
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01031-5
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12966_020_01031_5.pdf1.35 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons