Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038876
Title: Protocol for a scoping review of digital health for older adults with cancer and their families
Authors: Cheng, K.K.-F.
Siah, R.C.-J. 
Ream, E.
Kanesvaran, R.
Armes, J.
Keywords: adult oncology
geriatric medicine
oncology
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: NLM (Medline)
Citation: Cheng, K.K.-F., Siah, R.C.-J., Ream, E., Kanesvaran, R., Armes, J. (2020). Protocol for a scoping review of digital health for older adults with cancer and their families. BMJ open 10 (8) : e038876. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038876
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The potential for digital medicine and healthcare in geriatric oncology settings has received much attention. This scoping review will summarise the nature and extent of the existing literature that describes and examines digital health development, implementation, evaluation, outcome and experience for older adults with cancer, their families and their healthcare providers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Arksey and O'Malley's six stages of scoping review methodology framework will be used. Searches will be conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase via OvidSP, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Plus via EBSCO, Scopus and PsycINFO via OvidSP for published articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals from year 2000 onwards. In addition, we will screen databases for all prospectively registered trials. Research articles using quantitative or qualitative study design or reviews will be included if they describe or report the design, development or usability of digital health interventions in the treatment and care of patients 65 years of age or older with cancer and their families before, during and after cancer treatment. Grey literature will not be searched and included. Two investigators will independently perform the literature search, eligibility assessments and study selection. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram for the scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to delineate the search decision process. For included articles, the extracted results will be synthesised both quantitatively and qualitatively and reported under key conceptual categories of this scoping review. Research gaps and opportunities will be identified and summarised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since this review will only include published data, ethics approval will not be sought. The results of the review will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. We will also engage with relevant stakeholders within research team's networks to determine suitable approaches for dissemination. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Source Title: BMJ open
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197592
ISSN: 20446055
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038876
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1136_bmjopen_2020_038876.pdf272.95 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons