Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/GERIATRICS5040061
Title: Enablers and barriers of a cross-cultural geriatric education distance training programme: The Singapore-Uganda experience
Authors: Ha, N.H.L.
Chua, X.Y.
Musimenta, S.
Akankwasa, E.
Pussayapibul, N.
Toh, H.J.
Ginting, M.L.
Samarasekera, D.D. 
Tam, W.J.
Yap, P.L.K.
Low, J.A.Y.H.
Keywords: Cultural competency
Distance learning
Geriatric education
Health professional education
Videoconferencing
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: MDPI AG
Citation: Ha, N.H.L., Chua, X.Y., Musimenta, S., Akankwasa, E., Pussayapibul, N., Toh, H.J., Ginting, M.L., Samarasekera, D.D., Tam, W.J., Yap, P.L.K., Low, J.A.Y.H. (2020). Enablers and barriers of a cross-cultural geriatric education distance training programme: The Singapore-Uganda experience. Geriatrics (Switzerland) 5 (3) : 61. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/GERIATRICS5040061
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: By 2050, 80% of the world's older population will reside in developing countries. There is a need for culturally appropriate training programs to increase awareness of eldercare issues, promote knowledge of how to better allocate resources to geriatric services, and promulgate elder-friendly policies. A monthly distance geriatric education programme between a public hospital in Singapore and health institute in Uganda was implemented. This study explored the enablers and barriers to the delivery of culturally appropriate geriatric education programmes via a videoconferencing platform. Methods: We conducted 12 in-depth interviews with six teachers from Singapore and six learners from Uganda. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using an inductive thematic approach to analysis with the aid of the NVivo software. Results: Enablers included inter-personal real-time interactions between teachers and learners whereas misaligned perceptions of cross-cultural differences between Singaporean teachers and Ugandan learners were a barrier. Rapport building, teacher motivation and institutional support were perceived to contribute to the programme's sustainability. Overall, Ugandan learners perceived that the training improved knowledge, skills, attitude and practice of geriatric care. Participants suggested that future initiatives consider aligning cross-cultural perceptions between partners, conducting a training needs analysis, exploring complementary modes of information dissemination, and allotting time for more interaction, thereby reinforcing mutual sharing. Adequate publicity and appropriate incentivisation may also better sustain the programme. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that cross-cultural training via a videoconferencing platform was feasible. Our results inform planners of future distance educational programmes of how to improve standards of cross-cultural competency and forge promising international partnerships. © 2020 by the authors.
Source Title: Geriatrics (Switzerland)
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197501
ISSN: 23083417
DOI: 10.3390/GERIATRICS5040061
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_GERIATRICS5040061.pdf264.93 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons