Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Doctoral nursing education in east and Southeast Asia: Characteristics of the programs and students' experiences of and satisfaction with their studies
Authors: Molassiotis, A.
Wang, T.
Hoang, H.T.X.
Tan, J.-Y.
Yamamoto-Mitani, N.
Cheng, K.F. 
Tuazon, J.A.
Kunaviktikul, W.
Suen, L.K.P.
Keywords: Asia
Doctoral education
PhD degree
Student experience
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Citation: Molassiotis, A., Wang, T., Hoang, H.T.X., Tan, J.-Y., Yamamoto-Mitani, N., Cheng, K.F., Tuazon, J.A., Kunaviktikul, W., Suen, L.K.P. (2020). Doctoral nursing education in east and Southeast Asia: Characteristics of the programs and students' experiences of and satisfaction with their studies. BMC Medical Education 20 (1) : 143. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: The characteristics of nursing doctoral programs and the doctoral students' experience have not been thoroughly investigated. Hence, this study aimed to describe the characteristics of nursing doctoral programs in East and South East Asian (ESEA) countries and regions from the views of doctoral program coordinators, and to explore the students' experiences of and satisfaction with their doctoral nursing program. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using two self-designed questionnaires, one focusing on PhD program coordinators and the other on doctoral students. Characteristics of the nursing doctoral programs focused on program characteristics, faculty characteristics, career pathways for graduates, and challenges for nursing doctoral education. Doctoral students' assessment of study experiences included quality of supervision, doctoral training programs, intellectual/cultural climate of institutions, general facilities/support, and the overall study experience and satisfaction. Results: In the PhD coordinators survey, 46 institutions across nine ESEA countries and regions participated. More than half of nursing departments had academic members from other health science disciplines to supervise doctoral nursing students. The majority of graduates were holding academic or research positions in higher education institutions. Faculty shortages, delays in the completion of the program and inadequate financial support were commonly reported challenges for doctoral nursing education. In the students' survey, 193 doctoral students participated. 88.3% of the students were satisfied with the supervision they received from their supervisors; however, 79% reported that their supervisors 'pushed' them to publish research papers. For doctoral training programs, 75.5% were satisfied with their curriculum; but around half reported that the teaching training components (55.9%) and mobility opportunities (54.2%) were not included in their programs. For overall satisfaction with the intellectual and cultural climate, the percentages were 76.1 and 68.1%, respectively. Only 66.7% of the students felt satisfied with the facilities provided by their universities and nursing institutions. Conclusion: Doctoral nursing programs in most of the ESEA countries value the importance of both research and coursework. Doctoral nursing students generally hold positive experiences of their study. However, incorporating more teaching training components, providing more opportunities for international mobility, and making more effort to improve research-related facilities may further enhance the student experience. There is also a need to have international guidelines and standards for quality indicators of doctoral programs to maintain quality and find solutions to global challenges in nursing doctoral education. © 2020 The Author(s).
Source Title: BMC Medical Education
ISSN: 14726920
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02060-1
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12909_020_02060_1.pdf585.68 kBAdobe PDF




checked on Sep 22, 2022


checked on Oct 7, 2021

Page view(s)

checked on Sep 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons