Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00458-z
Title: Early prediction of high flow nasal cannula therapy outcomes using a modified ROX index incorporating heart rate
Authors: Goh, K.J.
Chai, H.Z.
Ong, T.H. 
Sewa, D.W.
Phua, G.C. 
Tan, Q.L.
Keywords: Acute respiratory failure
High flow nasal cannula
High flow oxygen therapy
Pneumonia
Postextubation
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Citation: Goh, K.J., Chai, H.Z., Ong, T.H., Sewa, D.W., Phua, G.C., Tan, Q.L. (2020). Early prediction of high flow nasal cannula therapy outcomes using a modified ROX index incorporating heart rate. Journal of Intensive Care 8 (1) : 41. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00458-z
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: The ROX index (ratio of pulse oximetry/FIO2 to respiratory rate) has been validated to predict high flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) outcomes in patients with pneumonia. We evaluated a modified ROX index incorporating heart rate (HR) in patients initiated on HFNC for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and as a preventative treatment following planned extubation. Methods: We performed a prospective observational cohort study of 145 patients treated with HFNC. ROX-HR index was defined as the ratio of ROX index over HR (beats/min), multiplied by a factor of 100. Evaluation was performed using area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and cutoffs assessed for prediction of HFNC failure: defined as the need for mechanical ventilation. Results: Ninety-nine (68.3%) and 46 (31.7%) patients were initiated on HFNC for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and following a planned extubation, respectively. The majority (86.9%) of patients had pneumonia as a primary diagnosis, and 85 (56.6%) patients were immunocompromised. Sixty-one (42.1%) patients required intubation (HFNC failure). Amongst patients on HFNC for acute respiratory failure, HFNC failure was associated with a lower ROX and ROX-HR index recorded at time points between 1 and 48 h. Within the first 12 h, both indices performed with the highest AUROC at 10 h as follows: 0.723 (95% CI 0.605-0.840) and 0.739 (95% CI 0.626-0.853) for the ROX and ROX-HR index respectively. A ROX-HR index of > 6.80 was significantly associated with a lower risk of HFNC failure (hazard ratio 0.301 (95% CI 0.143-0.663)) at 10 h. This association was also observed at 2, 6, 18, and 24h, even with correction for potential confounding factors. For HFNC initiated post-extubation, only the ROX-HR index remained significantly associated with HFNC failure at all recorded time points between 1 and 24 h. A ROX-HR > 8.00 at 10 h was significantly associated with a lower risk of HFNC failure (hazard ratio 0.176 (95% CI 0.051-0.604)). Conclusion: While validation studies are required, the ROX-HR index appears to be a promising tool for early identification of treatment failure in patients initiated on HFNC for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or as a preventative treatment after a planned extubation. © 2020 The Author(s).
Source Title: Journal of Intensive Care
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/196129
ISSN: 2052-0492
DOI: 10.1186/s40560-020-00458-z
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s40560_020_00458_z.pdf1.06 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons