Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103837
Title: A conceptual framework to untangle the concept of urban ecosystem services
Authors: Tan, Puay Yok 
Zhang, Jingyuan 
Masoudi, Mahyar 
Alemu, Jahson Berhane 
Edwards, Peter J
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
Richards, Daniel R 
Saunders, Justine
Song, Xiao Ping
Wong, Lynn Wei
Keywords: Science & Technology
Social Sciences
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physical Sciences
Ecology
Environmental Studies
Geography
Geography, Physical
Regional & Urban Planning
Urban Studies
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Physical Geography
Public Administration
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
LANDSCAPE SUSTAINABILITY
CARBON STORAGE
ECOLOGY
CITIES
SCIENCE
CHALLENGES
HEALTH
TREES
PERSPECTIVE
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2020
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Citation: Tan, Puay Yok, Zhang, Jingyuan, Masoudi, Mahyar, Alemu, Jahson Berhane, Edwards, Peter J, Gret-Regamey, Adrienne, Richards, Daniel R, Saunders, Justine, Song, Xiao Ping, Wong, Lynn Wei (2020-08-01). A conceptual framework to untangle the concept of urban ecosystem services. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 200. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103837
Abstract: Urban ecosystem service (UES) is becoming an influential concept to guide the planning, design, and management of urban landscapes towards urban sustainability. However, its use is hindered by definitional ambiguity, and the conceptual bases underpinning its application remain weak. This is exemplified by two different but equally valid interpretations of UES: “urban ecosystem services”, referring to ecosystem services from analogs of natural and semi-natural ecosystems within urban boundaries, and “urban ecosystem services”, a much broader term that includes the former group as well as urban services in a city. While we recognize that a single definition of UES is not possible nor necessary as its application is context-dependent, it is nevertheless useful to clarify the relationships between these interpretations to promote consistent use, and importantly, explore how a broader interpretation of UES might advance its applications in areas that have been neglected. We developed a conceptual framework that links UES to natural and human-derived capital to explain the relationships between the dual meanings of UES and proposed three normative propositions to guide its application: (1) integrate holistically multiple components of natural capital to provide UES, (2) reduce dependence on non-renewable abiotic resources and human-derived capital, and (3) enhance UES through technology. The framework we developed helps to resolve the current ambiguity in the meanings of UES, highlights the need to recognise neglected aspects of natural capital important for UES, and can be used to clarify relationships with related concepts conveying dependence of human well-being on nature.
Source Title: LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/190480
ISSN: 01692046
18726062
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103837
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
A conceptual framework to untangle the concept of urban ecosystem services.pdfPublished version2.6 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
checked on May 13, 2022

Page view(s)

130
checked on May 12, 2022

Download(s)

7
checked on May 12, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.