Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.505
Title: Review of clinical studies of perampanel in adolescent patients
Authors: Kim, H.D
Chi, C.-S
Desudchit, T
Nikanorova, M
Visudtibhan, A
Nabangchang, C
Chan, D.W.S 
Fong, C.Y
Chang, K.-P
Kwan, S.-Y
Reyes, F.L
Huang, C.-C
Likasitwattanakul, S
Lee, W.-T
Yung, A
Dash, A
Keywords: AMPA receptor
perampanel
placebo
abnormal behavior
adolescent
aggression
anger
asthenia
cognition
convulsion
decreased appetite
dizziness
drug dose titration
drug tolerability
drug withdrawal
fatigue
follow up
growth
half life time
human
irritability
maintenance therapy
multicenter study (topic)
phase 2 clinical trial (topic)
phase 3 clinical trial (topic)
priority journal
randomized controlled trial (topic)
Review
rhinitis
risk benefit analysis
seizure
somnolence
Issue Date: 2016
Citation: Kim, H.D, Chi, C.-S, Desudchit, T, Nikanorova, M, Visudtibhan, A, Nabangchang, C, Chan, D.W.S, Fong, C.Y, Chang, K.-P, Kwan, S.-Y, Reyes, F.L, Huang, C.-C, Likasitwattanakul, S, Lee, W.-T, Yung, A, Dash, A (2016). Review of clinical studies of perampanel in adolescent patients. Brain and Behavior 6 (9) : e00505. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.505
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Aim: To assess the clinical trial and real-world data for adjunctive perampanel in adolescents and develop consensus recommendations to guide the use of perampanel in this population in clinical practice. Methods: In May 2015, 15 epilepsy experts attended a Consensus Development Meeting to assess the clinical trial data for perampanel, specific to the adolescent age group (12-17 years) and develop consensus treatment recommendations. Results and Discussion: Analysis of the adolescent subgroup data of three pivotal placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trials investigating perampanel in patients with ongoing focal epileptic seizures despite receiving one to three antiepileptic drugs found that perampanel 4–12 mg was superior to placebo. The tolerability profile of perampanel was generally acceptable. Adolescent patients receiving long-term treatment with perampanel in an open-label extension study maintained improvements in seizure control compared with baseline, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. A phase 2 study showed that perampanel had no clinically important effects on cognitive function, growth, and development. Conclusion: Perampanel is a welcome addition to the armamentarium of existing antiepileptic drugs as it represents a new approach in the management of epilepsy, with a novel mechanism of action, and the potential to have a considerable impact on the treatment of adolescents with epilepsy. © 2016 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Source Title: Brain and Behavior
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/183320
ISSN: 21623279
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.505
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1002_brb3_505.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons