Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1590/2446-4740.06617
Title: Neuro-behavioral pattern of sleep bruxism in wakefulness
Authors: Azevedo, M.R
Sena, R
de Freitas, A.M
Silva, A.N
Lamounier Júnior, E.A
Soares, A.B 
Keywords: Bioelectric potentials
Electroencephalography
Surveys
Anxiety
Emotion
Sleep bruxism
Visual evoked potential
Wakefulness
Sleep research
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Azevedo, M.R, Sena, R, de Freitas, A.M, Silva, A.N, Lamounier Júnior, E.A, Soares, A.B (2018). Neuro-behavioral pattern of sleep bruxism in wakefulness. Research on Biomedical Engineering 34 (1) : 1-8. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1590/2446-4740.06617
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Introduction: Sleep Bruxism (SB) is a non-functional rhythmic movement of the mandible with multifactorial aetiology and complex diagnose. It has been the subject of various studies over the past decades and it is considered a result of actions of the Central Nervous System modulated by Autonomous Nervous System. In this work, we test the hypothesis that SB subjects present a typical and defined neurobehavioral pattern that can be distinct from that of non-bruxers subjects and can be measured during wakefulness. Methods: Fifteen sleep bruxers (experimental-group EG) and fifteen non-bruxers (control-group CG) took part in the experiments. To verify the presence and severity of SB, clinical examinations, anamneses and questionnaires, including Visual Analogic Scale - faces (VAS-f) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were applied. To legitimate the diagnoses of SB, a disposable instrument (Bitestrip ®) to assess the masseter activity during sleep was employed. All subjects were submitted to a set of experiments for measuring various visual evoked responses during the presentation of visual stimuli (pleasant, unpleasant and neutral images). Events in Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) were used to compare the neural responses of both CG and EG. Results: VAS-f showed EG with higher perception of stress than CG (trait: p=0.05), and lower quality of life for (state: p=0.007). STAI I and II showed significant differences of anxiety between CG and EG (p=0.013 and p=0.004, respectively), being EG the highest. The EG Bitestrip scores confirmed that 100% of subjects were sleep bruxers. Significant differences were found between EG and CG for events associated with emotional (pleasant and unpleasant) images in the first 250 ms after stimulation. In general, EG subjects showed higher amplitude and shorter latency of VEP events. Conclusion: It is possible to distinguish between SB and non-bruxers subjects during wakefulness, based on differences in amplitude and latency of cortical event related potentials elicited by visual stimulation. SB subjects show greater amplitudes in specific events in frontal areas when non-pleasant images are shown. Latencies tend to be anticipated in SB compared to CG subjects. © 2018, Brazilian Society of Biomedical Engineering. All rights reserved.
Source Title: Research on Biomedical Engineering
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/182110
ISSN: 24464732
DOI: 10.1590/2446-4740.06617
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1590_2446-4740_06617.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons