Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0806-0
Title: Engaging clinicians and patients to assess and improve frailty measurement in adults with end stage renal disease
Authors: Van Pilsum Rasmussen, S
Konel, J
Warsame, F
Ying, H
Buta, B
Haugen, C
King, E
DiBrito, S
Varadhan, R
Rodríguez-Mañas, L
Walston, J.D
Segev, D.L
McAdams-DeMarco, M.A 
Keywords: adult
aged
Article
clinical article
clinical nurse specialist
cognitive defect
controlled study
Delphi study
end stage renal disease
exhaustion
falling
female
frailty
geriatric patient
grip strength
human
male
middle aged
phenotype
physical activity
walking
weight reduction
chronic kidney failure
Delphi study
frailty
pathophysiology
patient participation
physician attitude
procedures
Adult
Aged
Delphi Technique
Female
Frailty
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Participation
Physician's Role
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Van Pilsum Rasmussen, S, Konel, J, Warsame, F, Ying, H, Buta, B, Haugen, C, King, E, DiBrito, S, Varadhan, R, Rodríguez-Mañas, L, Walston, J.D, Segev, D.L, McAdams-DeMarco, M.A (2018). Engaging clinicians and patients to assess and improve frailty measurement in adults with end stage renal disease. BMC Nephrology 19 (1) : 8. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0806-0
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: The Fried frailty phenotype, a measure of physiologic reserve defined by 5 components (exhaustion, unintentional weight loss, low physical activity, slow walking speed, and poor grip strength), is associated with poor outcomes among ESRD patients. However, these 5 components may not fully capture physiologic reserve in this population. We aimed to ascertain opinions of ESRD clinicians and patients about the usefulness of the Fried frailty phenotype and interventions to improve frailty in ESRD patients, and to identify novel components to further characterize frailty in ESRD. Methods: Clinicians who treat adults with ESRD completed a 2-round Delphi study (n = 41 and n = 36, respectively; response rate = 87%). ESRD patients completed a survey at transplant evaluation (n = 460; response rate = 81%). We compared clinician and patient opinions on the constituent components of frailty. Results: Clinicians were more likely than patients to say that ESRD makes patients frail (97.6% vs. 60.2%). There was consensus among clinicians that exhaustion, low physical activity, slow walking speed, and poor grip strength characterize frailty in ESRD patients; however, 29% of clinicians thought weight loss was not relevant. Patients were less likely than clinicians to say that the 5 Fried frailty components were relevant. Clinicians identified 10 new ESRD-specific potential components including falls (64%), physical decline (61%), and cognitive impairment (39%). Clinicians (83%) and patients (80%) agreed that intradialytic foot-peddlers might make ESRD patients less frail. Conclusions: There was consensus among clinicians and moderate consensus among patients that frailty is more common in ESRD. Weight loss was not seen as relevant, but new components were identified. These findings are first steps in refining the frailty phenotype and identifying interventions to improve physiologic reserve specific to ESRD patients. © 2018 The Author(s).
Source Title: BMC Nephrology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181221
ISSN: 14712369
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0806-0
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12882-017-0806-0.pdf403.44 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons