Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0806-0
Title: | Engaging clinicians and patients to assess and improve frailty measurement in adults with end stage renal disease | Authors: | Van Pilsum Rasmussen, S Konel, J Warsame, F Ying, H Buta, B Haugen, C King, E DiBrito, S Varadhan, R Rodríguez-Mañas, L Walston, J.D Segev, D.L McAdams-DeMarco, M.A |
Keywords: | adult aged Article clinical article clinical nurse specialist cognitive defect controlled study Delphi study end stage renal disease exhaustion falling female frailty geriatric patient grip strength human male middle aged phenotype physical activity walking weight reduction chronic kidney failure Delphi study frailty pathophysiology patient participation physician attitude procedures Adult Aged Delphi Technique Female Frailty Humans Kidney Failure, Chronic Male Middle Aged Patient Participation Physician's Role |
Issue Date: | 2018 | Citation: | Van Pilsum Rasmussen, S, Konel, J, Warsame, F, Ying, H, Buta, B, Haugen, C, King, E, DiBrito, S, Varadhan, R, Rodríguez-Mañas, L, Walston, J.D, Segev, D.L, McAdams-DeMarco, M.A (2018). Engaging clinicians and patients to assess and improve frailty measurement in adults with end stage renal disease. BMC Nephrology 19 (1) : 8. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0806-0 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International | Abstract: | Background: The Fried frailty phenotype, a measure of physiologic reserve defined by 5 components (exhaustion, unintentional weight loss, low physical activity, slow walking speed, and poor grip strength), is associated with poor outcomes among ESRD patients. However, these 5 components may not fully capture physiologic reserve in this population. We aimed to ascertain opinions of ESRD clinicians and patients about the usefulness of the Fried frailty phenotype and interventions to improve frailty in ESRD patients, and to identify novel components to further characterize frailty in ESRD. Methods: Clinicians who treat adults with ESRD completed a 2-round Delphi study (n = 41 and n = 36, respectively; response rate = 87%). ESRD patients completed a survey at transplant evaluation (n = 460; response rate = 81%). We compared clinician and patient opinions on the constituent components of frailty. Results: Clinicians were more likely than patients to say that ESRD makes patients frail (97.6% vs. 60.2%). There was consensus among clinicians that exhaustion, low physical activity, slow walking speed, and poor grip strength characterize frailty in ESRD patients; however, 29% of clinicians thought weight loss was not relevant. Patients were less likely than clinicians to say that the 5 Fried frailty components were relevant. Clinicians identified 10 new ESRD-specific potential components including falls (64%), physical decline (61%), and cognitive impairment (39%). Clinicians (83%) and patients (80%) agreed that intradialytic foot-peddlers might make ESRD patients less frail. Conclusions: There was consensus among clinicians and moderate consensus among patients that frailty is more common in ESRD. Weight loss was not seen as relevant, but new components were identified. These findings are first steps in refining the frailty phenotype and identifying interventions to improve physiologic reserve specific to ESRD patients. © 2018 The Author(s). | Source Title: | BMC Nephrology | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181221 | ISSN: | 14712369 | DOI: | 10.1186/s12882-017-0806-0 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_1186_s12882-017-0806-0.pdf | 403.44 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License