Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00537
Title: Flux balance analysis of plant metabolism: The effect of biomass composition and model structure on model predictions
Authors: Yuan, H
Cheung, C.Y.M 
Hilbers, P.A.J
van Riel, N.A.W
Issue Date: 2016
Citation: Yuan, H, Cheung, C.Y.M, Hilbers, P.A.J, van Riel, N.A.W (2016). Flux balance analysis of plant metabolism: The effect of biomass composition and model structure on model predictions. Frontiers in Plant Science 7 (42461) : 537. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00537
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: The biomass composition represented in constraint-based metabolic models is a key component for predicting cellular metabolism using flux balance analysis (FBA). Despite major advances in analytical technologies, it is often challenging to obtain a detailed composition of all major biomass components experimentally. Studies examining the influence of the biomass composition on the predictions of metabolic models have so far mostly been done on models of microorganisms. Little is known about the impact of varying biomass composition on flux prediction in FBA models of plants, whose metabolism is very versatile and complex because of the presence of multiple subcellular compartments. Also, the published metabolic models of plants differ in size and complexity. In this study, we examined the sensitivity of the predicted fluxes of plant metabolic models to biomass composition and model structure. These questions were addressed by evaluating the sensitivity of predictions of growth rates and central carbon metabolic fluxes to varying biomass compositions in three different genome-/large-scale metabolic models of Arabidopsis thaliana. Our results showed that fluxes through the central carbon metabolism were robust to changes in biomass composition. Nevertheless, comparisons between the predictions from three models using identical modeling constraints and objective function showed that model predictions were sensitive to the structure of the models, highlighting large discrepancies between the published models. © 2016 Yuan, Cheung, Hilbers and van Riel.
Source Title: Frontiers in Plant Science
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179932
ISSN: 1664462X
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00537
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3389_fpls_2016_00537.pdf1.06 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons