Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0967-7
Title: Laryngeal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT): A case report and review of the literature
Authors: Tay, S.Y 
Balakrishnan, A 
Keywords: Article
case report
child
contrast enhancement
differential diagnosis
endoscopic surgery
female
follow up
histopathology
hoarseness
hospital discharge
human
larnygeal plasma cell granuloma
laryngeal biopsy
larynx granuloma
larynx papillomatosis
larynx surgery
larynx tumor
Malay (people)
nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
plasma cell granuloma
postoperative period
priority journal
respiratory distress
school child
Singapore
biopsy
bronchoscopy
diagnostic imaging
Granuloma, Plasma Cell
hoarseness
immunohistochemistry
Laryngeal Diseases
laryngoscopy
larynx
muscle tumor
myofibroblast
nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
pathology
procedures
treatment outcome
Biopsy
Bronchoscopy
Child
Female
Granuloma, Plasma Cell
Hoarseness
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Laryngeal Diseases
Laryngoscopy
Larynx
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Myofibroblasts
Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue
Treatment Outcome
Issue Date: 2016
Citation: Tay, S.Y, Balakrishnan, A (2016). Laryngeal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT): A case report and review of the literature. Journal of Medical Case Reports 10 (1) : 967. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0967-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: This case report is interesting as cases of children with laryngeal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor are not common and previously had been presented as isolated case reports. This is the first case report in Asia describing a laryngeal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and its removal using an endoscopic approach. Case presentation: Our patient is a 12-year-old Malay girl from Singapore who presented with hoarseness without respiratory distress. The initial impression was that of a granuloma or a papilloma. We did a biopsy, which confirmed the histology to be inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and a magnetic resonance imaging scan showed a contrast-enhanced lesion. The lesion was excised completely using an endoscopic approach. The child was discharged well on the first postoperative day and she has been on follow-up for a year in the clinic. Conclusions: This report highlights the importance of understanding the differential diagnosis for a child with hoarseness. It is not uncommon for a pediatrician, a general practitioner, and a pediatric otolaryngologist to see a child presenting with hoarseness. In most cases, the diagnosis made would be screamer's nodules, which is commonly seen in children. In a small group, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis form the diagnosis. Over the past few years, the cases of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis have decreased significantly. Laryngeal tumors are not common in children. However, we must maintain a high index of suspicion when we have a child with hoarseness who does not improve with speech therapy and watchful waiting. In such situations, a stroboscope is usually necessary to diagnose the voice problems and to rule out pathological conditions such as laryngeal tumors. If left untreated, the lesion can grow with time and result in a life-threatening airway condition. We also demonstrate our endoscopic technique in this report, and it has proven to be safe with no increased recurrence and much lower morbidity. © 2016 The Author(s).
Source Title: Journal of Medical Case Reports
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179925
ISSN: 17521947
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-016-0967-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s13256-016-0967-7.pdf3.2 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons