Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15655
Title: Hematology oncology practice in the Asia-Pacific APHCON survey results from the 6th international hematologic malignancies conference: Bridging the gap 2015, Beijing, China
Authors: Huang, X.J
Liu, K
Ritchie, D
Keywords: acute lymphoblastic leukemia
acute myeloid leukemia
aplastic anemia
Article
cell therapy
China
chronic lymphatic leukemia
chronic myeloid leukemia
controlled study
doctor patient relation
donor selection
health care delivery
health care system
health survey
Hodgkin disease
human
longitudinal study
multiple myeloma
myelodysplastic syndrome
nonhodgkin lymphoma
patient care
patient information
patient preference
practice guideline
questionnaire
thalassemia
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Impact Journals LLC
Citation: Huang, X.J, Liu, K, Ritchie, D (2017). Hematology oncology practice in the Asia-Pacific APHCON survey results from the 6th international hematologic malignancies conference: Bridging the gap 2015, Beijing, China. Oncotarget 8 (25) : 41620-41630. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15655
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: This report serves as a snapshot of the state-of-knowledge in the Asia Pacific (APAC) Hematology Oncology community, and establishes a baseline for longitudinal investigations to follow changes in best practices over time. The objective of this study was to understand the approach to hematologic diseases, common standards of care and best practices, issues that remain controversial or debated, and educational or resource gaps that warrant attention. We used mobile application to disseminate and distribute questionnaires to delegates during the 6th international hematologic malignancies conference hosted by the APAC Hematology Consortium at Beijing, China. User responses were collected in an anonymous fashion. We report survey results in two ways: the overall responses, and responses as stratified between Chinese physicians and "Other" represented nationalities. Overall geographical concordance in survey responses was positive and strong. Perhaps more interesting than instances of absolute agreement, these data provide a unique opportunity to identify topics in which physician knowledge or opinions diverge. We assigned questions from all modules to broad categories of: patient information; diagnosis; treatment preference; transplantation; and general knowledge/opinion. On average, we observed a geographic difference of 15% for any particular answer choice, and this was fairly constant across survey modules. These results reveal utility and need for widespread and ongoing initiatives to assess knowledge and provide evidencebased education in real time. The data will be made more valuable by longitudinal participation, such that we can monitor changes in the state of the art over time. © Xiao Jun Huang et al.
Source Title: Oncotarget
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179761
ISSN: 1949-2553
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15655
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_18632_oncotarget_15655.pdf2.11 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons