Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0111
Title: Growth Hormone Research Society perspective on the development of long-acting growth hormone preparations
Authors: Christiansen, J.S
Backeljauw, P.F
Bidlingmaier, M
Keywords: growth hormone
long acting drug
long acting growth hormone
unclassified drug
human growth hormone
adult
clinical trial (topic)
Conference Paper
drug design
drug efficacy
drug industry
drug safety
drug synthesis
endocrinologist
human
immunogenicity
knowledge
medical research
medical society
patient compliance
pediatrician
priority journal
randomized controlled trial (topic)
workshop
adverse effects
consensus
Dwarfism, Pituitary
hormone substitution
methodology
procedures
Clinical Trials as Topic
Consensus
Dwarfism, Pituitary
Hormone Replacement Therapy
Human Growth Hormone
Humans
Research Design
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: BioScientifica Ltd.
Citation: Christiansen, J.S, Backeljauw, P.F, Bidlingmaier, M (2016). Growth Hormone Research Society perspective on the development of long-acting growth hormone preparations. European Journal of Endocrinology 174 (6) : C1-C8. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0111
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Objective: The Growth Hormone (GH) Research Society (GRS) convened a workshop to address important issues regarding trial design, efficacy, and safety of long-acting growth hormone preparations (LAGH). Participants: A closed meeting of 55 international scientists with expertise in GH, including pediatric and adult endocrinologists, basic scientists, regulatory scientists, and participants from the pharmaceutical industry. Evidence: Current literature was reviewed for gaps in knowledge. Expert opinion was used to suggest studies required to address potential safety and efficacy issues. Consensus process: Following plenary presentations summarizing the literature, breakout groups discussed questions framed by the planning committee. Attendees reconvened after each breakout session to share group reports. A writing team compiled the breakout session reports into a draft document that was discussed and revised in an open forum on the concluding day. This was edited further and then circulated to attendees from academic institutions for review after the meeting. Participants from pharmaceutical companies did not participate in the planning, writing, or in the discussions and text revision on the final day of the workshop. Scientists from industry and regulatory agencies reviewed the manuscript to identify any factual errors. Conclusions: LAGH compounds may represent an advance over daily GH injections because of increased convenience and differing phamacodynamic properties, providing the potential for improved adherence and outcomes. Better methods to assess adherence must be developed and validated. Long-term surveillance registries that include assessment of efficacy, cost-benefit, disease burden, quality of life, and safety are essential for understanding the impact of sustained exposure to LAGH preparations. © 2016 European Society of Endocrinology.
Source Title: European Journal of Endocrinology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179567
ISSN: 0804-4643
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-16-0111
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1530_EJE-16-0111.pdf902.67 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons