Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2
Title: A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors: Battersby, N.J
Dattani, M
Rao, S
Cunningham, D
Tait, D
Adams, R
Moran, B.J 
Khakoo, S
Tekkis, P
Rasheed, S
Mirnezami, A
Quirke, P
West, N.P
Nagtegaal, I
Chong, I
Sadanandam, A
Valeri, N
Thomas, K
Frost, M
Brown, G
Keywords: capecitabine
fluorouracil
folinic acid
oxaliplatin
advanced cancer
Article
cancer grading
cancer localization
cancer survival
cell density
chemoradiotherapy
controlled study
drug toxicity
feasibility study
health economics
human
human cell
human tissue
intervention study
magnetic resonance tumor regression grade
morbidity
multicenter study
multiple cycle treatment
nuclear magnetic resonance
open study
patient safety
phase 3 clinical trial
population research
prospective study
quality of life
randomized controlled trial
rectum cancer
rectum carcinoma
reproducibility
treatment response
tumor growth
tumor regression
unspecified side effect
adenocarcinoma
adjuvant chemoradiotherapy
cancer grading
clinical protocol
clinical trial
colostomy
cost benefit analysis
diagnostic imaging
disease exacerbation
disease free survival
economics
health care cost
intention to treat analysis
methodology
mortality
neoadjuvant therapy
nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
pathology
predictive value
rectum tumor
secondary
time factor
treatment outcome
tumor recurrence
Adenocarcinoma
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
Clinical Protocols
Colostomy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Feasibility Studies
Health Care Costs
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Predictive Value of Tests
Quality of Life
Rectal Neoplasms
Research Design
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: Battersby, N.J, Dattani, M, Rao, S, Cunningham, D, Tait, D, Adams, R, Moran, B.J, Khakoo, S, Tekkis, P, Rasheed, S, Mirnezami, A, Quirke, P, West, N.P, Nagtegaal, I, Chong, I, Sadanandam, A, Valeri, N, Thomas, K, Frost, M, Brown, G (2017). A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 18 (1) : 394. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a 'good' mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a 'poor response' identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy. Methods/design: TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis. Discussion: The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520. Registered on 5 February 2016. @ 2017 The Author(s).
Source Title: Trials
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179461
ISSN: 17456215
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s13063-017-2085-2.pdf1.59 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons