Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2
Title: | A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial | Authors: | Battersby, N.J Dattani, M Rao, S Cunningham, D Tait, D Adams, R Moran, B.J Khakoo, S Tekkis, P Rasheed, S Mirnezami, A Quirke, P West, N.P Nagtegaal, I Chong, I Sadanandam, A Valeri, N Thomas, K Frost, M Brown, G |
Keywords: | capecitabine fluorouracil folinic acid oxaliplatin advanced cancer Article cancer grading cancer localization cancer survival cell density chemoradiotherapy controlled study drug toxicity feasibility study health economics human human cell human tissue intervention study magnetic resonance tumor regression grade morbidity multicenter study multiple cycle treatment nuclear magnetic resonance open study patient safety phase 3 clinical trial population research prospective study quality of life randomized controlled trial rectum cancer rectum carcinoma reproducibility treatment response tumor growth tumor regression unspecified side effect adenocarcinoma adjuvant chemoradiotherapy cancer grading clinical protocol clinical trial colostomy cost benefit analysis diagnostic imaging disease exacerbation disease free survival economics health care cost intention to treat analysis methodology mortality neoadjuvant therapy nuclear magnetic resonance imaging pathology predictive value rectum tumor secondary time factor treatment outcome tumor recurrence Adenocarcinoma Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant Clinical Protocols Colostomy Cost-Benefit Analysis Disease Progression Disease-Free Survival Feasibility Studies Health Care Costs Humans Intention to Treat Analysis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neoadjuvant Therapy Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Predictive Value of Tests Quality of Life Rectal Neoplasms Research Design Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
Issue Date: | 2017 | Citation: | Battersby, N.J, Dattani, M, Rao, S, Cunningham, D, Tait, D, Adams, R, Moran, B.J, Khakoo, S, Tekkis, P, Rasheed, S, Mirnezami, A, Quirke, P, West, N.P, Nagtegaal, I, Chong, I, Sadanandam, A, Valeri, N, Thomas, K, Frost, M, Brown, G (2017). A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 18 (1) : 394. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International | Abstract: | Background: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a 'good' mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a 'poor response' identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy. Methods/design: TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis. Discussion: The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520. Registered on 5 February 2016. @ 2017 The Author(s). | Source Title: | Trials | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179461 | ISSN: | 17456215 | DOI: | 10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_1186_s13063-017-2085-2.pdf | 1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License