Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3333-y
Title: EVEREST study report 3: diagnostic challenges of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Lessons learnt from screening failures in the EVEREST study
Authors: Tan, C.S
Ngo, W.K
Lim, L.W
Tan, N.W 
Lim, T.H
on behalf of the EVEREST Study Group
Keywords: adult
age related macular degeneration
aged
angioma
Article
clinical article
diagnostic error
female
human
indocyanine green angiography
male
microaneurysm
middle aged
multicenter study (topic)
phase 4 clinical trial (topic)
polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
priority journal
randomized controlled trial (topic)
retina detachment
retinal angiomatous proliferation
subretinal neovascularization
very elderly
young adult
adolescent
antagonists and inhibitors
Choroidal Neovascularization
clinical trial
controlled study
double blind procedure
fluorescence angiography
macular degeneration
multicenter study
phase 4 clinical trial
photochemotherapy
Polyps
randomized controlled trial
angiogenesis inhibitor
coloring agent
indocyanine green
porphyrin
ranibizumab
vasculotropin A
VEGFA protein, human
verteporfin
Adolescent
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
Choroidal Neovascularization
Coloring Agents
Diagnostic Errors
Double-Blind Method
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
Humans
Indocyanine Green
Macular Degeneration
Male
Middle Aged
Photochemotherapy
Polyps
Porphyrins
Ranibizumab
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Citation: Tan, C.S, Ngo, W.K, Lim, L.W, Tan, N.W, Lim, T.H, on behalf of the EVEREST Study Group (2016). EVEREST study report 3: diagnostic challenges of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Lessons learnt from screening failures in the EVEREST study. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 254 (10) : 1923-1930. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3333-y
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Purpose: To describe screening failures in the EVEREST study by examining the imaging characteristics that enabled differentiation of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) from cases that were subsequently diagnosed not to be PCV. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of 34 patients with PCV reported as screening failures from EVEREST study. Standardised confocal scanning laser indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) images were graded by the Central Reading Centre to confirm PCV diagnosis based on the presence of early focal sub-retinal hyperfluorescence on ICGA and at least one of the following six diagnostic criteria: (1) nodular appearance of polyp(s) on stereoscopic examination, (2) hypofluorescent halo around nodule(s), (3) presence of a branching vascular network, (4) pulsation of polyp(s) on dynamic ICGA, (5) orange sub-retinal nodules on colour fundus photography, or (6) massive sub-macular haemorrhage (4 disc areas in size). Additional detailed image grading was performed with stereo-imaging and dynamic early-phase ICGA. Results: Of the 95 screened PCV cases, 34 were excluded: (1) cases not suitable for recruitment as per the study protocol (n = 14), (2) equivocal lesions on ICGA characterised by small hyperfluorescent dots (n = 9), and (3) cases that were definitely not PCV (non-PCV, n = 11), identified by definitive diagnoses which included one case each of micro-aneurysm, retinal angiomatous proliferation, retino-choroidal anastomosis, small type-2 choroidal neovascularisation, retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) window defect and disciform scar; two cases of lesions where the choroidal vessel changed its course; and three cases of late-onset RPE staining. Conclusions: Standardised image grading techniques used in EVEREST study enabled effective differentiation of non-PCV from actual PCV. © 2016, The Author(s).
Source Title: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179289
ISSN: 0721-832X
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3333-y
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1007_s00417-016-3333-y.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons