Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1462-7
Title: Differences in Patient Characteristics and Midterm Outcome Between Asian and European Patients Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Authors: Burgmans, M.C
Too, C.W 
Fiocco, M
Kerbert, A.J.C
Lo, R.H.G
Schaapman, J.J
van Erkel, A.R
Coenraad, M.J
Tan, B.S 
Keywords: sorafenib
adult
aged
Article
Asian
cancer incidence
cancer prognosis
cancer recurrence
cancer size
cancer survival
cause specific survival
chemoembolization
European
female
follow up
hepatitis B
hepatitis C
human
liver cell carcinoma
liver resection
liver transplantation
major clinical study
male
middle aged
overall survival
priority journal
race difference
radioembolization
radiofrequency ablation
radiofrequency ablation device
retrospective study
treatment outcome
age
Asian continental ancestry group
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
catheter ablation
Caucasian
causality
comorbidity
hepatitis B
incidence
Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic
Liver Neoplasms
procedures
statistics and numerical data
tumor recurrence
Age Factors
Aged
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Catheter Ablation
Causality
Comorbidity
European Continental Ancestry Group
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatitis B
Humans
Incidence
Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic
Liver Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Springer New York LLC
Citation: Burgmans, M.C, Too, C.W, Fiocco, M, Kerbert, A.J.C, Lo, R.H.G, Schaapman, J.J, van Erkel, A.R, Coenraad, M.J, Tan, B.S (2016). Differences in Patient Characteristics and Midterm Outcome Between Asian and European Patients Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 39 (12) : 1708-1715. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1462-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare patient characteristics and midterm outcomes after RFA for unresectable Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asian and European cohorts. Materials and Methods: The study was based on retrospective analysis of 279 patients (mean 64.8 ± 12.1 years; 208 males) treated with RFA for de novo HCC in tertiary referral centers in Singapore and the Netherlands, with median follow-up of 28.2 months (quartiles: 13.1–40.5 months). Cumulative incidence of recurrence and death were analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: Age was higher in the Asian group: 66.5 versus 60.1 years (p < 0.0001). The most common etiology was hepatitis B in the Asian group (48.0 %) and alcohol-induced cirrhosis in Europeans (54.4 %); p < 0.001. Asian patients had less advanced disease: 35.5, 55.0, and 3.0 %, respectively, had BCLC 0, A, and B versus 21.5, 58.2, and 15.2 % in the European group (p = 0.01). The cumulative incidences of recurrence in the Asian group at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 37.0, 56.4, 62.3, and 67.7 %, respectively, compared to 32.6, 47.2, 49.7, and 53.4 % in the European group (p = 0.474). At 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, the cumulative incidence rates of death in the Asian group were 2.0, 3.9, 4.9, and 4.9 %, respectively, corresponding to 7.7, 9.2, 14.1, and 21.0 % in the European group (p = 0.155). Conclusion: Similar short-term treatment outcomes are achieved with RFA in HCC patients in the South-East Asian and Northern-European populations. Midterm recurrence and death rates differ between the groups as a result of differences in baseline patient characteristics and patient selection. Our study provides insight relevant to the design of future international studies. © 2016, The Author(s).
Source Title: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179275
ISSN: 0174-1551
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-016-1462-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1007_s00270-016-1462-7.pdf442.73 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons