Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-50
Title: Developing a placebo-controlled trial in surgery: Issues of design, acceptability and feasibility
Authors: Campbell, M.K
Entwistle, V.A 
Cuthbertson, B.H
Skea, Z.C
Sutherland, A.G
McDonald, A.M
Norrie, J.D
Carlson, R.V
Bridgman, S
Keywords: anesthesist
arthroscopic lavage
arthroscopy
article
clinical decision making
cost effectiveness analysis
feasibility study
general anesthesia
health practitioner
health survey
human
interview
knee osteoarthritis
lavage
medical ethics
patient assessment
physician attitude
research ethics
study design
United Kingdom
arthroscopy
attitude to health
clinical trial
controlled clinical trial
controlled study
ethics
health personnel attitude
knee osteoarthritis
lavage
methodology
multicenter study
patient attitude
patient selection
pilot study
placebo effect
randomized controlled trial
treatment outcome
Anesthesia, General
Arthroscopy
Attitude of Health Personnel
Feasibility Studies
Great Britain
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Selection
Pilot Projects
Placebo Effect
Research Design
Therapeutic Irrigation
Treatment Outcome
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: BMC
Citation: Campbell, M.K, Entwistle, V.A, Cuthbertson, B.H, Skea, Z.C, Sutherland, A.G, McDonald, A.M, Norrie, J.D, Carlson, R.V, Bridgman, S (2011). Developing a placebo-controlled trial in surgery: Issues of design, acceptability and feasibility. Trials 12 : 50. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-50
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Surgical placebos are controversial. This in-depth study explored the design, acceptability, and feasibility issues relevant to designing a surgical placebo-controlled trial for the evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic lavage for the management of people with osteoarthritis of the knee in the UK.Methods: Two surgeon focus groups at a UK national meeting for orthopaedic surgeons and one regional surgeon focus group (41 surgeons); plenary discussion at a UK national meeting for orthopaedic anaesthetists (130 anaesthetists); three focus groups with anaesthetists (one national, two regional; 58 anaesthetists); two focus groups with members of the patient organisation Arthritis Care (7 participants); telephone interviews with people on consultant waiting lists from two UK regional centres (15 participants); interviews with Chairs of UK ethics committees (6 individuals); postal surveys of members of the British Association of Surgeons of the Knee (382 surgeons) and members of the British Society of Orthopaedic Anaesthetists (398 anaesthetists); two centre pilot (49 patients assessed).Results: There was widespread acceptance that evaluation of arthroscopic lavage had to be conducted with a placebo control if scientific rigour was not to be compromised. The choice of placebo surgical procedure (three small incisions) proved easier than the method of anaesthesia (general anaesthesia). General anaesthesia, while an excellent mimic, was more intrusive and raised concerns among some stakeholders and caused extensive discussion with local decision-makers when seeking formal approval for the pilot.Patients were willing to participate in a pilot with a placebo arm; although some patients when allocated to surgery became apprehensive about the possibility of receiving placebo, and withdrew. Placebo surgery was undertaken successfully.Conclusions: Our study illustrated the opposing and often strongly held opinions about surgical placebos, the ethical issues underpinning this controversy, and the challenges that exist even when ethics committee approval has been granted. It showed that a placebo-controlled trial could be conducted in principle, albeit with difficulty. It also highlighted that not only does a placebo-controlled trial in surgery have to be ethically and scientifically acceptable but that it also must be a feasible course of action. The place of placebo-controlled surgical trials more generally is likely to be limited and require specific circumstances to be met. Suggested criteria are presented.Trial registration number: The trial was assigned ISRCTN02328576 through http://controlled-trials.com/ in June 2006. The first patient was randomised to the pilot in July 2007. © 2011 Campbell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: Trials
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178181
ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-50
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1745-6215-12-50.pdf531.22 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons