Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1053-7
Title: Quality of radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials of prostate cancer
Authors: Soon, Y.Y
Chen, D
Tan, T.H
Tey, J 
Keywords: Article
cancer radiotherapy
clinical effectiveness
clinical outcome
Clinical Target Volume
human
intervention study
male
Medline
organs at risk
prescription
prostate cancer
publishing
quality control
radiation dose fractionation
radiation injury
radiotherapy dosage
randomized controlled trial (topic)
simulation
treatment planning
practice guideline
prostate tumor
publication
quality control
randomized controlled trial (topic)
standards
statistics and numerical data
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Male
Periodicals as Topic
Prostatic Neoplasms
Publishing
Quality Control
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Soon, Y.Y, Chen, D, Tan, T.H, Tey, J (2018). Quality of radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials of prostate cancer. Radiation Oncology 13 (1) : 108. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1053-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Good radiotherapy reporting in clinical trials of prostate radiotherapy is important because it will allow accurate reproducibility of radiotherapy treatment and minimize treatment variations that can affect patient outcomes. The aim of our study is to assess the quality of prostate radiotherapy (RT) treatment reporting in randomized controlled trials in prostate cancer. Methods: We searched MEDLINE for randomized trials of prostate cancer, published from 1996 to 2016 and included prostate RT as one of the intervention arms. We assessed if the investigators reported the ten criteria adequately in the trial reports: RT dose prescription method; RT dose-planning procedures; organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints; target volume definition, simulation procedures; treatment verification procedures; total RT dose; fractionation schedule; conduct of quality assurance (QA) as well as presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery. We performed multivariate logistic regression to determine the factors that may influence the quality of reporting. Results: We found 59 eligible trials. There was significant variability in the quality of reporting. Target volume definition, total RT dose and fractionation schedule were reported adequately in 97% of included trials. OAR constraints, simulation procedures and presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery were reported adequately in 30% of included trials. Twenty-four trials (40%) reported seven criteria or more adequately. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that trials that published their quality assurance results and cooperative group trials were more likely to have adequate quality in reporting in at least seven criteria. Conclusion: There is significant variability in the quality of reporting on prostate radiotherapy treatment in randomized trials of prostate cancer. We need to have consensus guidelines to standardize the reporting of radiotherapy treatment in randomized trials. © 2018 The Author(s).
Source Title: Radiation Oncology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178085
ISSN: 1748717X
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1053-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s13014-018-1053-7.pdf815.97 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons