Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082629
Title: Pathways to coastal resiliency: The Adaptive Gradients Framework
Authors: Hamin, E.M
Abunnasr, Y
Dilthey, M.R
Judge, P.K
Kenney, M.A
Kirshen, P
Sheahan, T.C
DeGroot, D.J
Ryan, R.L
McAdoo, B.G 
Nurse, L
Buxton, J.A
Sutton-Grier, A.E
Albright, E.A
Marin, M.A
Fricke, R
Keywords: adaptive management
coastal zone
coastal zone management
cost-benefit analysis
environmental change
environmental restoration
flooding
greenhouse gas
greenspace
sea level change
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Hamin, E.M, Abunnasr, Y, Dilthey, M.R, Judge, P.K, Kenney, M.A, Kirshen, P, Sheahan, T.C, DeGroot, D.J, Ryan, R.L, McAdoo, B.G, Nurse, L, Buxton, J.A, Sutton-Grier, A.E, Albright, E.A, Marin, M.A, Fricke, R (2018). Pathways to coastal resiliency: The Adaptive Gradients Framework. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10 (8) : 2629. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082629
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Current and future climate-related coastal impacts such as catastrophic and repetitive flooding, hurricane intensity, and sea level rise necessitate a new approach to developing and managing coastal infrastructure. Traditional "hard" or "grey" engineering solutions are proving both expensive and inflexible in the face of a rapidly changing coastal environment. Hybrid solutions that incorporate natural, nature-based, structural, and non-structural features may better achieve a broad set of goals such as ecological enhancement, long-term adaptation, and social benefits, but broad consideration and uptake of these approaches has been slow. One barrier to the widespread implementation of hybrid solutions is the lack of a relatively quick but holistic evaluation framework that places these broader environmental and societal goals on equal footing with the more traditional goal of exposure reduction. To respond to this need, the Adaptive Gradients Framework was developed and pilot-tested as a qualitative, flexible, and collaborative process guide for organizations to understand, evaluate, and potentially select more diverse kinds of infrastructural responses. These responses would ideally include natural, nature-based, and regulatory/cultural approaches, as well as hybrid designs combining multiple approaches. It enables rapid expert review of project designs based on eight metrics called "gradients", which include exposure reduction, cost efficiency, institutional capacity, ecological enhancement, adaptation over time, greenhouse gas reduction, participatory process, and social benefits. The framework was conceptualized and developed in three phases: relevant factors and barriers were collected from practitioners and experts by survey; these factors were ranked by importance and used to develop the initial framework; several case studies were iteratively evaluated using this technique; and the framework was finalized for implementation. The article presents the framework and a pilot test of its application, along with resources that would enable wider application of the framework by practitioners and theorists. © 2018 by the authors.
Source Title: Sustainability (Switzerland)
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/177849
ISSN: 20711050
DOI: 10.3390/su10082629
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_su10082629.pdf2.21 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Sep 22, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Oct 5, 2021

Page view(s)

158
checked on Sep 22, 2022

Download(s)

5
checked on Sep 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons