Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0053-z
Title: Evaluation of the applicability of the Immuno-solidphase allergen chip (ISAC) assay in atopic patients in Singapore
Authors: Santosa, A 
Andiappan, A.K
Rotzschke, O
Wong, H.C
Chang, A
Bigliardi-Qi, M
Wang, D.-Y 
Bigliardi, P.L 
Keywords: house dust allergen
immunoglobulin E
adult
allergic rhinitis
Article
asthma
atopic dermatitis
atopy
Blomia tropicalis
Chinese
controlled study
Dermatophagoides farinae
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus
female
genetic difference
human
immunoassay
immunoglobulin blood level
major clinical study
male
prick test
priority journal
sensitization
Singaporean
skin test
Issue Date: 2015
Citation: Santosa, A, Andiappan, A.K, Rotzschke, O, Wong, H.C, Chang, A, Bigliardi-Qi, M, Wang, D.-Y, Bigliardi, P.L (2015). Evaluation of the applicability of the Immuno-solidphase allergen chip (ISAC) assay in atopic patients in Singapore. Clinical and Translational Allergy 5 (1) : 9. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0053-z
Abstract: Background/Objective: Molecular-based allergy diagnostics are gaining popularity in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate their role in the tropics, given the inherent genetic and environmental differences. Methods: We recruited subjects with history of atopy and collected data on demographics and atopic symptoms using validated questionnaires. Subjects underwent a series of skin prick tests (SPT). Serum total and specific IgE levels were measured using ImmunoCAP FEIA and ImmunoCAP ISAC® , respectively. We describe their pattern of sensitization and agreement between test methods. Results: A total of 135 subjects were recruited; mean ± SD age of 31.18 ± 12.72 years, 52.7% female. Allergic rhinitis (AR) was the most prevalent clinical manifestation of atopy (70.7%), followed by atopic dermatitis (AD) (50.5%) and asthma (26.2%). Polysensitization was seen in 51.1% of subjects by both SPT and ISAC. House dust mites (HDM) were the dominant allergen, with sensitization in 67.8% and 62% of subjects on SPT and ISAC, respectively. A group of subjects with monosensitization to B. tropicalis was identified. HDM sensitization was strongly associated with AR, while AD and asthma were not associated with sensitization to any allergen. Agreement between SPT and ISAC was mostly suboptimal. Greatest agreement was documented for the measurement of HDM sensitization with both methods (κ = 0.64). Sensitization to the bulk of the remaining allergens in the ISAC panel was infrequent. Conclusion: Multiplex methods should not be used as a screening tool, especially in a population with lower rates of polysensitization and a dominant sensitizing allergen. There may be a role in adjusting the antigen spectrum in the ISAC panel to regional differences. © 2015 Santosa et al.
Source Title: Clinical and Translational Allergy
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/175997
ISSN: 2045-7022
DOI: 10.1186/s13601-015-0053-z
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s13601-015-0053-z.pdf600.66 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.