Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-149
Title: Barriers to implementation of a redesign of information transfer and feedback in acute care: Results from a multiple case study
Authors: Van Leijen-Zeelenberg, J.E
Van Raak, A.J
Duimel-Peeters, I.G
Kroese, M.E
Brink, P.R
Ruwaard, D
Vrijhoef, H.J.M. 
Keywords: emergency medicine
feedback system
health services research
human
information processing
interpersonal communication
Netherlands
nonbiological model
patient care
patient safety
questionnaire
standards
total quality management
Communication
Continuity of Patient Care
Emergency Medicine
Feedback
Focus Groups
Humans
Models, Organizational
Netherlands
Organizational Case Studies
Patient Safety
Quality Improvement
Questionnaires
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Citation: Van Leijen-Zeelenberg, J.E, Van Raak, A.J, Duimel-Peeters, I.G, Kroese, M.E, Brink, P.R, Ruwaard, D, Vrijhoef, H.J.M. (2014). Barriers to implementation of a redesign of information transfer and feedback in acute care: Results from a multiple case study. BMC Health Services Research 14 : 149. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-149
Abstract: Accurate information transfer is an important element of continuity of care and patient safety. Despite the demonstrated urge for improvement of communication in acute care, there is a lack of data on improvements of communication. This study aims to describe the barriers to implementation of a redesign of the existing model for information transfer and feedback. Methods. A case study with six cases (i.e. acute care chains), using mixed methods was carried out in the Netherlands. The redesign was implemented in one acute care chain while the five other acute care chains served as control groups. Focus group interviews were held with members of the acute care chains and questionnaires were sent to care providers working in the acute care chains. Results: Respondents reported three sets of barriers for implementation of the model: (a) existing routines for information transfer and feedback in organizations within the acute care chain; (b) barriers related to the implementation method and time period; and (c) the absence of a high 'sense of urgency' amongst providers in the acute care chain which would aid in improving the communication process. Conclusions: This study shows that organizational factors play an important role in the success or failure of redesigning a communication process. Organizational routines can hamper implementation of a redesign if it differs too much from the routines of care providers involved. Besides focussing on provider characteristics in the implementation of a redesigned process, specific attention should be paid to unlearning existing organizational routines. © 2014 van Leijen-Zeelenberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: BMC Health Services Research
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174305
ISSN: 14726963
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-149
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1472-6963-14-149.pdf362.66 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Oct 23, 2021

Page view(s)

85
checked on Oct 28, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.